Skip to main content

Apex Legends Mobile isn’t a great fit for small screens

Apex Legends is one of those multiplayer games I love, but am terrible at. When I was invited to a press demo for the game’s limited-time Control mode earlier this year, I was thoroughly embarrassed as my peers routinely downed me with a headshot from across the map. I’ve always wanted to play it more than I do, but I never felt cut out for the twitchy world of PC players.

Apex Legends Mobile solves that issue for me, though it creates some new problems of its own in the process. The standalone mobile version of the battle royale hit more or less feels like a one-to-one adaptation of its bigger counterpart (the most notable difference is the number of pop-up notifications trying to nudge players to the shop). That means I can fully enjoy the shooter in a more casual portable setting, one free from the mouse and keyboard crowd.

Recommended Videos

While it’s a smooth experience that I’m enjoying my time with already, it’s hard to shake the feeling that Apex Legends isn’t exactly the best fit for small screens.

A clean adaptation

Like its console and PC counterpart, Apex Legends Mobile is a faced-paced battle royale where one squad tries to outlast the rest. While developer Respawn continually emphasized that the mobile version was an entire standalone experience from the original, it’s shockingly not very different. You’ll still drop into Kings Canyon with a squad of heroes, each of which has its own ability. There are fewer modes and characters at launch, but nothing about the experience feels fundamentally different.

Apex Legends Mobile: Gameplay Launch Trailer

That’s for better and worse. On one hand, it’s a classic case of “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” Apex Legends is still one of the best battle royale games on the market today, if not one of the finest shooters period. Its quick mobility is immediately fun on any device, and the character focus can make each round feel slightly different. All of that holds true here; it feels exactly like Apex Legends, just running on a phone.

What’s most surprising is how clean the experience is. While it’s not as technically demanding as its older brother, it’s still beefy for a mobile title. Graphical hitches are minor and I’ve found that the game runs at a stable framerate. For those who love Apex Legends and simply want to be able to play it no matter what devices they have on hand at any given time, it’ll scratch that itch.

Squinting to victory

Though Apex Legends runs quite well on mobile devices, I’m not convinced it’s an ideal fit in its current implementation. That has less to do with what Respawn has accomplished here and more with the general industry push to cram everything onto a portable device without building with a smaller screen in mind.

Even playing with my iPhone 12 smashed right up to my face, I really have to squint to see what’s going on. When enemies are at mid-range and beyond, they’re a blip on my screen. On-screen text is minuscule, making it tough to even read what weapons I have equipped or what’s happening in the kill feed. On top of that, the game’s several touch controls appear on-screen too, further cluttering the UI.

A player shoots an enemy while on a zipline.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Speaking of touch controls, Apex Legends isn’t really a game that’s easy without a controller or keyboard. Because of its ability-based gameplay, players won’t just run, shoot, and reload. They’ll also need to use character skills and perform executions, in addition to sliding, pinging, looting, and more. It’s already hard enough trying to aim and shoot at the same time in a mobile shooter (which seems to be why the game includes an “auto-shoot” option).

I’m exclusively playing with a Backbone controller attached to my phone rather than fussing with touch inputs. It feels fantastic, but it’s almost like I’m cheating. It feels like I have a clear advantage considering that anyone using touch controls can’t really aim and shoot at the same time without enabling auto-shoot. I notice that when I’m going one-on-one with another player, I’m able to hit them way more than they hit me. I can sense that they’re forced to make start-and-stop movements to adjust their aim while I can move and shoot freely (or maybe I’m just playing bots).

Apex Legends Mobile underscores how tricky it can be to simply bring an established game to mobile. Even with its control considerations, it still feels like a PC game crammed onto a small screen. Though I’m having fun with it so far, I’m not sure why I’d choose to play the mobile version over PC, or even Switch, considering how similar the versions are.

Wraith steps out of a portal in Apex Legends.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Part of me wishes the mobile version did more to differentiate itself as a portable-exclusive title. Rocket League Sideswipe, for instance, smartly adapts the basic Rocket League experience into a simplified 2D game that’s easy to control with touch inputs. The two versions are notably different, but fun for their own reasons. I had wondered if Apex Legends Mobile was taking a similar approach considering that it wouldn’t feature cross-play, but that’s not the case. It’s just Apex Legends for people who don’t own a gaming device.

Ultimately, that’s fine. Considering I own every modern console, Apex Legends Mobile doesn’t need to be for me. It’ll be more useful for casual players and kids who deserve to play one of the best shooters on the market today regardless of what devices they have. The portable version is still an excellent game, just not an excellent mobile game.

Apex Legends Mobile is free to download right now on iOS and Android devices.

Topics
Giovanni Colantonio
As Digital Trends' Senior Gaming Editor, Giovanni Colantonio oversees all things video games at Digital Trends. As a veteran…
Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom isn’t our Game of the Year, but it’s the strongest No. 2 ever
Link giving a thumbs-up with a smile.

When we asked our writers to give us a list of their favorite games of 2023, everyone had a different game in the top spot. We saw votes for Super Mario Bros. Wonder, Alan Wake 2, Hi-Fi Rush, and even Sonic Superstars. Baldur's Gate 3 ultimately won out, but what stuck out to me the most following that process was how, on almost everyone's list, the same game was in that No. 2 slot: The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom.

Released by Nintendo in May after a long wait, Tears of the Kingdom would have been the industry's unequivocal game of the year in any other year. Although its competition was too stiff in this packed year for that to be the case, that doesn't make Tears of the Kingdom any less of an experience. In fact, I think that earning a spot near the top on almost everyone's personal list at Digital Trends demonstrates how widely appealing Nintendo's latest Zelda game is and that end-of-year gaming conversations should be about uplifting great games, not nitpicking their flaws to determine which one's the best.
Recognizing great games
Tears of the Kingdom is a monumental achievement in open-world game design. It essentially has three worlds stacked on top of each other. From almost any point in Hyrule, it's possible to stop, look around, and find several points of interest around, above, and below yourself. That alone makes it a game that consistently delivers a sense of awe and discovery, even after dozens of hours of playtime.

Read more
Final Fantasy VII Ever Crisis isn’t the faithful remake you’re expecting
final fantasy vii ever crisis beta impressions 7 fire

When Final Fantasy VII Remake launched in 2020, it was a revelation for me. The bold reimagining taught me that a video game remake can be much more than a nostalgic revisit, instead using the history of the original to tell a high-concept story about destiny. Though I immediately revered it as one of gaming’s greatest accomplishments, others weren’t so pleased. There’s a not-so-small collection of purists out there who simply wanted a 1:1 remake of the PlayStation version with pretty graphics.

Fortunately for that crowd, Square Enix is delivering that faithful remake with Final Fantasy VII Ever Crisis. Well, maybe not as faithful as you're expecting.

Read more
Heroes of Middle-Earth isn’t afraid to play with Lord of the Rings canon
An evil Galadriel in Heroes of Middle-Earth

The Lord of the Rings franchise has a storied history in almost every entertainment medium, and we are entering a new era for its film and gaming efforts. As Amazon continues to produce The Rings of Power, Middle-Earth Enterprises has been acquired by Embracer Group. Instead of all of The Lord of Rings' games being made by Warner Bros., which had been the case for some time, we are now seeing lots of studios make games in the Lord of the Rings universe, providing their own spin on the idea. While The Lord of the Rings: Gollum is doing that on consoles this month, mobile game players are also getting a brand new game.
The Lord of the Rings: Heroes of Middle-Earth is on the way from Capital Games and EA, and I attended a preview event for the game ahead of its launch on May 10. This game takes the character-collecting RPG approach established through its previous game Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes and gives it a Middle-Earth makeover. What’s most intriguing about the title, though, is that it’s not afraid to ask “What if?” while playing around in the world of this long-running franchise.
What if?
When it comes to gameplay, my brief playtime with Heroes of Middle-Earth didn’t surprise me. It’s exactly what you’d expect from a mobile character-collecting RPG set in The Lord of the Rings universe. Still, the character-based approach allows Capital Games to play in The Lord of the Rings sandbox in ways few creatives have been able to. It has more freedom to craft more experimental scenarios with the franchise's iconic characters, as it’s not as concerned with falling in line with lore.

The premise is that players have discovered a new Ring of Power, which they must use to keep The Lord of the Rings timeline intact as a mysterious enemy is trying to throw it in disarray. That setup means that the game can create scenarios that don’t necessarily align with the Middle-Earth canon. Players can make characters from different time periods, races, and allegiances team up in a way that wouldn’t work anywhere else. They’ll encounter a Galadriel who was corrupted by the Ring and other characters who may have strayed from the path laid for them in the books and films. Post-launch, some of these alternate versions of characters will eventually become playable as well.
In the age of the multiverse story in media, these kinds of “What if?” scenarios make for a novel The Lord of the Rings game set pieces and give the developers plenty of room to come up with future characters for players to collect. In a press roundtable, Heroes of Middle-Earth Design Director Jay Ambrosini was undoubtedly enthusiastic about these concepts but said the team is also making sure any of these ideas and alternate timelines that they do pursue feeling respectful toward the world J.R.R. Tolkien established.
“There are so many characters that you look at and see the small little decisions that happen and affect them, and it’s so fun to think about what happens if they made the other decision,” Ambrosini says. “They are fun things to explore and talk about, but the most important thing to us is that we’re telling a genuine Tolkien story and that we’re very faithful to the laws of the world that exist. Good deeds are rewarded with goodness; bad deeds are rewarded with bad things happening. We’re making sure that we’re appreciating and celebrating those pieces of Tolkien’s work.”

Read more