Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Samsung S95C OLED hands-on review: it’s time to get excited

What could be worth traveling 3,000 miles in a cramped airplane to New Jersey? The chance to go hands-on with not one, but three of Samsung’s most hotly anticipated TVs for 2023.

I got up close and personal with the 65-inch QN95C Neo QLED, the 75-inch QN900C 8K Neo QLED, and the 77-inch S95C QD-OLED. I had Samsung representatives on hand to address questions as I had them, and I got the opportunity to make some comparisons among the TVs that I don’t often get a chance to do so soon after the TVs have been announced.

Recommended Videos

When I first arrived, I wondered if Samsung’s surprisingly strong QN95C 4K Neo QLED might actually steal some of the highly anticipated 77-inch S95C QD-OLED’s thunder. You see, I started by checking out the 8K QN900C, then progressed to the 4K QN95C — both are QLED TVs. The latter was so impressive, I had to wonder if the premium that came along with the new QD-OLED tech was going to be justified. But then I turned on the 77-inch S95C, and all wonder was washed away.

The Samsung S95C is one of the most gorgeous TVs I’ve laid eyes on, and it is easily in the running to be the best TV of 2023.

Even with the impressive upscaling on display with the 8K QN900C and the utterly astonishing brightness and black levels of the QN95C, the S95C QD-OLED still won my heart that day. And a big part of that was because I was so happy to see that QD-OLED performance in a 77-inch model — that really did a lot for me. I know a lot of people have been curious about whether the 77-inch size would make all that much of a difference – and it really does.

Brightness: reality vs. perception

Let’s back up and do a quick reminder for folks who may not have tuned in for this year’s CES. We learned that the second generation of Samsung’s QD-OLED technology is more efficient and has higher peak brightness – both in terms of white brightness, and pure red, green, and blue primary color brightness.

That means that the display panel itself could potentially hit up to 2,000 nits of brightness — that’s a very exciting number. But that’s what the panel can do. As we learned from last year, that doesn’t mean that Samsung Electronics — the arm of Samsung that takes the panel and makes it into a TV — is necessarily going to unlock all of that brightness potential.

So there’s been some concern that maybe Samsung would cap the peak brightness a bit. Samsung Display says the panel can peak at 2100 nits, but Samsung might want to rein the TV in a bit, either to increase its operating life span by not driving the blue OLED pixels at full blast or because Samsung feels being more selective about when the TV reaches peak brightness leads to a better user experience.

After measuring 1,600 nits with various test patterns, I think it is clear the TV’s potential brightness has been limited to some degree. During real-world viewing, it’s possible that Samsung’s processor could apply higher brightness sparingly, like a quick glint of reflected sunlight. I think we should hold out final judgment until we can test this TV with real content and see what the TV does with peak highlights for short bursts on-screen. But it does appear that Samsung isn’t just shooting for the moon when it comes to brightness. And that might be for the best.

The contrast ratio is just off the charts.

Fixating on peak white brightness gets in the way of understanding how this TV’s perceived brightness is going to play out. Because the color brightness is just unprecedented on OLED, and that includes last year’s QD-OLEDs.

After this trip, I no longer worry about QD-OLED’s viability in bright rooms. Can it get as bright as the QN95C Neo QLED? No, it can’t. But when you consider you’re talking about pure blacks on the S95C, the contrast ratio is just off the charts. And keep in mind that the measurements I took were in the TV’s filmmaker mode, with color temperature set to the warmer side. With a cooler color temperature (akin to the daylight light bulbs you might use in your home, with more of the blue light wavelengths involved), the perceived brightness of the S95C would be even higher.

At any rate, I watched the S95C  in a fully lit room with 18 fluorescent tubes glaring down and I was plenty dazzled by the perceived brightness of this television.

More first impressions

Now, on the not-as-glowing side, the TV’s out-of-box white point measurements weren’t great. Red and blue measured very hot in the brightest whites, and needed some taming down to get the white point accurate — strange, since the efficiency of the green quantum is meant to be quite good. Perhaps there was some overcompensating at play?

Setting that aside, the S95C’s out-of-box color accuracy was superb, and color volume was the best I measured all day: 74% of BT.2020 and 100% of Rec. 709. In TV geek speak, that’s spectacular.

Just watching TV for about 15 minutes was a treat, too. No red flags in terms of motion resolution, upscaling, or shadow detail.

Samsung S95C OLED
Douglas Murray / Digital Trends

Again, I’ll want to spend more time with the TV, but all signs point to this being in contention with one, maybe two other TVs for the best TV of 2023.

While I think it is fun to make some educated guesses about how these TVs are going to do this year, I also think it is important to remember that firmware updates can and will happen. I won’t be comfortable definitively ranking TVs and pitting them against each other until at least one month in,  and six weeks is probably a better waiting period. As Samsung deploys firmware updates to its TVs, their performance capabilities will change, for better or worse.

Don’t rush to judgment

Enjoy the excitement. Samsung earned it. But do remember that what you hear about these TVs through most of March are early impressions, subject to change. This year, perhaps more than any other in the past, it’s going to be prudent to see how things shake out after the TVs have been in the wild and any firmware updates that get deployed have been ironed out. If we learned nothing else from 2022 TVs, it’s that waiting a few weeks to indulge our inner early adopter is a smart move.

With that said, I think Samsung has some serious momentum going into 2023. Now that I’ve gotten to sit with these TVs for a while, get some early measurements, and just enjoy watching them,  there’s no doubt in my mind the QN95C and the S95C are going to be huge contenders for best TV awards this year.

Topics
Caleb Denison
Digital Trends Editor at Large Caleb Denison is a sought-after writer, speaker, and television correspondent with unmatched…
The best 8K TVs for 2024: from Samsung, LG, and Sony
A chameleon on a leafy branch shown on a Samsung QN900D.

Update: This story has been updated to reflect the sale price of the Samsung QN800D

While 4K Ultra HD has been the must-have resolution for TVs over the last several years, you can also find a handful of 8K TVs on the market. Made by companies like Samsung, Sony, and LG, these are some of the best TVs you can buy, and they contain double the amount of pixels of a 4K TV. As you can guess, this leads to some pretty incredible picture quality and upscaling on a level you’ve never seen before. And while there isn’t a ton of native 8K content on physical media or to stream, even the best-looking 4K Blu-ray gets a boost in picture quality on an 8K screen.

Read more
Samsung prices its entry-level S85D OLED TV starting at $1,700
Samsung S85D 4K OLED TV.

In January, Samsung teased that it would be adding a new line of OLED TVs priced below the S95D and S90D. That new model is the S85D and we now know that it will come in 55-, 65-, and 77-inch sizes, with prices starting at $1,700. This puts Samsung and LG on an even playing field in terms of OLED pricing, at least as it relates to LG's OLED C4 lineup.

Samsung has also confirmed new sizes for its S90D OLED TV, which will now be available in tiny (42-inch) and huge (83-inch) versions in addition to the previously announced 48-, 55-, 65-, and 77-inch models.

Read more
Samsung’s new 98-inch DU9000 4K TV is just $4,000. Can it beat TCL and Hisense?
Samsung 98-inch DU9000 4K TV.

Samsung's new 98-inch DU9000 Crystal UHD 4K TV is here and it's priced at $4,000, making it the company's most affordable 98-inch TV so far. Until now, if you wanted a Samsung TV in a massive, 98-inch screen size, you'd be looking at a starting price of $8,000 for the 98-inch QLED Q80C 4K TV. You can order the 98-inch DU9000 starting April 15, at samsung.com.

As 4K TVs get bigger, so does the size of the individual pixels, which can decrease perceived sharpness. Samsung says that the DU9000 is equipped with its Supersize Picture Enhancer, a technology that tries to compensate for this tendency.

Read more