Skip to main content

Could DC be using its TV properties to fill out the ranks of the Justice League movie?

dc using tv properties fill ranks justice league arrow
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Stephen Amell, who plays a reimagined version of the DC superhero Green Arrow in the CW TV show Arrow, has “had discussion” about appearing in the Justice League film as his TV character, the actor told ComingSoon.

“All we have to do for something like that to happen, or even be a possibility, is continue to take care of business with our show and then we put ourselves in a position – but the important thing is our show,” said Amell. “I have had discussions, but I think the gestation process for this project is a lot slower than most people think. I mean, they haven’t even shot the next one. They haven’t even shot a frame of the movie before the movie everyone thinks is the Justice League movie!”

Recommended Videos

Arrow is mid-way through its second season, and is considered a lock to be renewed for third. The show retells the story of Oliver Queen, a playboy millionaire who, after being stranded on a remote island for five years, learns to survive by becoming almost superhuman, especially where archery is concerned. When he eventually returns home, he finds his city in need of a hero, so he uses the skills he learned to fight various nefarious forces.

The show diverges from the original comic books slightly, but the spirit of the character remains. The TV character is also mostly grounded in reality, so if the people behind the upcoming Justice League wanted to add him in, he probably wouldn’t have much trouble being accepted into that universe. There would be a few problems for the show itself though.

Arrow has gone out of its way to avoid superpowers, with one or two exceptions. The show went so far as to take well known DC villains like Count Vertigo and strip them of their powers, instead reimagining that particular character as a criminal pushing a new drug called “vertigo.” Oliver Queen is an exceptional athlete and warrior, but he is still a man. Tying Arrow into a universe with a bevy of super-powered characters like Superman and Wonder Woman might seriously change the nature of the show.

Stephen Amell and Grant Gustin
Stephen Amell and Grant Gustin Image used with permission by copyright holder

There is also the question of the Flash. He was one of those aforementioned super-powered exceptions introduced on Arrow (although he did not have any powers at the time). The character of Barry Allen (played by Glee’s Grant Gustin), aka the Flash, was introduced in Arrow as a springboard to launch a Flash TV series, which is moving forward. If the people behind the rumored Justice League movie are looking at Amell’s Green Arrow, does it then stand to reason that they are also looking at Gustin’s Flash? It would make a certain amount of sense, as both the films and the TV shows are under the Warner Bros. umbrella, so there wouldn’t be any legal issues.

CW was also recently developing a TV series called Amazon which would have starred Wonder Woman, but the project fell apart. There was no specific reason given as to why it won’t go forward other than a general sense that it wasn’t coming together like the studio hoped. The recent casting of Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman in the upcoming Batman vs. Superman probably didn’t help. There is no particular reason for WB to not allow the character to be portrayed in two different mediums – in 2006 Superman was represented simultaneously in Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns on the big screen and in Smallville on TV – but the studio may be taking a cue from Marvel’s own efforts to create continuity across multiple mediums. That again raises the question of what to do with both the characters of Green Arrow and Flash. Green Arrow isn’t a vital component of the Justice League, but Flash is.

DC could use two characters that are already established, without having to film  individual movies to introduce them. It would mean WB would miss out on the potentially lucrative windfall a major film could bring. And after the flop that was Green Lantern, that might be a risk the studio is happy to pass on.

For now, this is all just talk. The filmmakers behind the rumored Justice League movie are certainly exploring all options, but it doesn’t mean they will choose to go this route.

Ryan Fleming
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Fleming is the Gaming and Cinema Editor for Digital Trends. He joined the DT staff in 2009 after spending time covering…
PlayStation had a better 2024 than it should have. Now it needs to focus
Astro Bot climbs on a DualSense controller.

This time last year, PlayStation had given us a roadmap for the brand's direction moving forward. It made grand commitments to live-service titles, put heavy investments in a mobile initiative, and continued to launch new hardware. If one were to judge PlayStation's 2024 on the rubric it set for itself, it would have been a failure. But that doesn't tell the full story.

PlayStation's 2024 felt like a restructuring phase. On the software side, we saw PlayStation embracing young players again, a decision that netted it a big Game of the Year win. Behind the games, we saw even bigger changes, specifically with the appointment of two new co-CEOs, Herman Hulst and Hideaki Nishino, that may have radical implications for the brand going forward. All of this sets the stage for a needed pivot for a brand that flirted with disaster in 2024. The only problem? That new vision hasn't been communicated yet, and fans' good will may be in short supply after a year of ups and downs.
Shifting strategy
Sony had a lot of pots on the stove this year, which made it a rollercoaster ride for fans. If there was one message PlayStation wanted to communicate as clearly as possible in 2023, it was the commitment to finding a live service hit. At the time, 12 such titles were reportedly in development and scheduled to be released between 2024 and 2026. So far, that effort has struggled to get off the starting blocks. Naughty Dog made the wise decision to cancel its Last of Us Online project to focus on single-player IPs such as the upcoming Intergalactic: The Heretic Prophet, but the real casualty was Concord.

Read more
At the end of 2024, Xbox finds itself as a crossroads
The Mental Wellness Awareness Xbox design.

At the end of 2024, Xbox finds itself at a crossroads that many fans wouldn’t have anticipated at the start of the year.

Finally bearing the fruits of its pricey Activision Blizzard acqusition, Xbox has had one of its most consistent years in terms of game output. Game Pass received a healthy number of day-one games throughout the year, and Microsoft delivered a new first-party title to the service every month between September and December.

Read more
Wordle Today: Wordle answer and hints for December 4
Someone playing Wordle on a smartphone.

We have the solution to Wordle on July 16, as well as some helpful hints to help you figure out the answer yourself, right here. We've placed the answer at the bottom of the page, so we don't ruin the surprise before you've had a chance to work through the clues. So let's dive in, starting with a reminder of yesterday's answer.
Yesterday's Wordle answer
Let's start by first reminding ourselves of yesterday's Wordle answer for those new to the game or who don't play it daily, which was "SAUNA." So we can say that the Wordle answer today definitely isn't that. Now, with that in mind, perhaps take another stab at it using one of these Wordle starting words and circle back if you have no luck.
Hints for today's Wordle
Still can't figure it out? We have today's Wordle answer right here, below. But first, one more thing: Let's take a look at three hints that could help you find the solution, without giving it away, so there's no need to feel guilty about keeping your streak alive -- you put in some work, after all! Or just keep scrolling for the answer.

Today’s Wordle includes the letter G.
Today’s Wordle uses three vowels.
Today's Wordle is a word for a bird of prey.

Read more