Skip to main content

Pedestrian detection systems don’t work most of the time, AAA study finds

Image used with permission by copyright holder

If you can’t see a pedestrian, don’t expect your car to either, says AAA. The organization recently conducted a study on pedestrian-detection systems, which are supposed to spot people walking into the path of a car and warn the driver or, in some cases, apply the brakes. But AAA found these systems don’t work reliably at night — exactly when most pedestrian fatalities occur, the organization noted.

AAA tested four sedans — a 2019 Chevrolet Malibu, 2019 Honda Accord, 2019 Toyota Camry, and a Tesla Model 3 — equipped with both pedestrian detection and autonomous emergency braking, which automatically applies the brakes if the car believes a collision is imminent. Tests were conducted on a closed course with “simulated pedestrian targets,” according to AAA. Researchers conducted tests in both day and nighttime conditions, at varying speeds, and with different behaviors from the fake pedestrians.

Recommended Videos

The results weren’t good. At night, none of the four systems reacted to — or even detected — the pedestrians, according to AAA. That’s especially troubling, as 75% of pedestrian fatalities occur after dark, AAA noted. Researchers also found that the systems were also ineffective at speeds over 30 mph. Even at 20 mph, a collision occurred 89% of the time when a car encountered a child darting out from between two parked cars. With two adults standing along the side of the road with their backs to traffic, and the car again traveling at 20 mph, a collision occurred in 80% of tests. A collision also happened in every test of a car encountering a pedestrian immediately after making a right turn.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Researchers found that the systems performed best when an adult crossed in front of cars traveling 20 mph. But even in that scenario, collisions still occurred 40% of the time, according to AAA. It’s a reminder that technology can’t replace an attentive human driver.

Drivers should not rely on pedestrian-detection systems to avoid collisions, according to AAA. The organization also advises drivers to familiarize themselves with the safety tech on their cars, both by asking questions at the dealership and reading the owner’s manual. Other AAA research has shown that drivers tend to put too much faith in driver-assist tech, and can easily overestimate tech’s capabilities. Drivers should also be extra cautious at night, AAA said.

Pedestrians can do their part to increase safety as well, according to AAA. It’s important to stay on sidewalks, and use crosswalks as often as possible, the organization noted. Just like drivers, pedestrians must remain alert at all times, and avoid distractions such as texting, AAA noted.

General Motors, manufacturer of the Chevy Malibu used in the AAA tests, released a statement in response to the study results. GM said that the technologies in question “have been proven to reduce crash speeds or help avoid crashes altogether.” The automaker cited a University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute study in which its autonomous emergency braking system “was effective in reducing rear end crashes by 44 percent,” but did not specifically mention collisions with pedestrians. Echoing AAA, GM did note that tech features “do not replace the primary responsibility of the driver.”

Updated on October 4, 2019: Added statement from General Motors.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Tesla’s ‘Model Q’ to arrive in 2025 at a price under $30K, Deutsche Bank says
teslas model q to arrive in 2025 at a price under 30k deutsche bank says y range desktop lhd v2

Only a short month and half ago, Tesla CEO Elon Musk told investors that outside of the just-released driverless robotaxi, a regular Tesla model priced at $25,000 would be “pointless” and “silly”.

"It would be completely at odds with what we believe,” Musk said.

Read more
It looks like the end of the road for Cruise robotaxis
A Cruise autonomous car.

Autonomous-driving operations at Cruise look certain to end after its main backer, General Motors (GM), said it will stop funding the initiative.

GM, which has owned about 90% of Cruise since 2016, announced the decision in a statement shared on Tuesday. It follows a challenging period for Cruise after one of its autonomous cars ran over a woman after she was knocked into its path by a human-driven car in San Francisco in October 2023. The incident led to California regulators suspending Cruise's license to test its driverless cars on the state's streets, a decision that prompted Cruise to pause operations in other locations where it operated. It restarted low-level testing in Arizona in May 2024.

Read more
Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs. Kia EV9: Electric SUV sisters battle it out
Hyundai Ioniq 9 driving

The long-awaited Hyundai Ioniq 9 is finally on its way. Hyundai has taken the wraps off a production-ready version of the electric SUV, showing a modern vehicle that could well be the electric SUV to beat when it finally rolls out to the public. But it will have to contend with Hyundai’s sister company in order to truly gain the title of best electric SUV in its price range. The Kia EV9 has been a go-to option for a few years now.

But is one of these SUVs actually better, or are they just different? We put the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and the Kia EV9 head to head to find out.
Design
There are some similarities in the designs of the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and the Kia EV9, but they also look a little different. First, the similarities. Both vehicles are clearly SUVs, with larger blocky shapes. But, while the Kia EV9 has straight lines and sharper angles, the Ioniq 9 is a little curvier, with a rounded roofline and sculpted curves in the side panels.

Read more