Skip to main content

AMD’s new CPUs decisively end the high-performance battle with Intel

A person holding the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Bill Roberson / Digital Trends

AMD is putting its foot down. In what Donny Woligroski, senior processor technical marketing manager at AMD, called the “worst-kept secret” in the world of desktop processors, Team Red announced it’s bringing its wildly popular Threadripper chips back to high-end desktops. They’re destined to be some of the best processors money can buy, and Intel currently has no way to compete.

If you’re not up to speed, AMD quietly and unceremoniously ended its Threadripper series for desktops a little over a year ago. When the company announced its previous generation of Threadripper CPUs, it revealed it would stick with the Enterprise-grade Pro series chips going forward. A little over 12 months after that announcement, AMD is reversing course.

Recommended Videos

The new Threadripper 7000 series is split into Pro and non-Pro parts, with the consumer parts reaching up to 64 cores and 128 threads. AMD has dominated the server market with its Epyc CPUs for years now, but in consumer desktops, AMD and Intel have been on mostly equal footing. That’s changing, as Intel doesn’t have any high-end desktop CPUs to effectively compete with AMD’s new Threadripper CPUs.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!
Threadripper 7980X Threadripper 7970X Threadripper 7960X
Cores/Threads 64 / 128 32 / 64 24 / 48
Total cache 320MB 160MB 152MB
Max turbo frequency 5.1GHz 5.3GHz 5.3GHz
TDP 350W 350W 350W
List price $5,000 $2,500 $1,500

As with previous Threadrippers, these are expensive chips targeted at users who need peak performance for work — or just for bragging rights. The massive core array brings power requirements up to 350 watts. You’ll also need a TRX50 motherboard, as well as CPU cooler with support for the massive chips. AMD has three high-end desktop Threadripper chips, all of which will be available on November 21.

Alongside the high-end desktop chips, AMD announced six new Threadripper Pro CPUs, reaching up to 96 cores and 192 threads. These are firmly targeted at businesses, and there are some important differences between the Pro and non-Pro chips.

A comparison of features between Threadripper and Threadripper Pro.
AMD

The WRX90 platform Pro processors support Pro manageability features for large computing fleets, as well as up 148 total PCIe lanes (144 useable) and eight-channel memory. By contrast, the high-end desktop platform lacks Pro manageability features, comes with quad-channel memory, and supports a total of 92 PCIe lanes (88 useable). You also can’t use one of the high-end desktop versions on the Pro chipset.

That’s not true in the opposite direction, though. AMD says you’ll be able to take a Pro processor and slot it into a TRX50 motherboard. That means you could, with enough cash, pack a 96-core CPU into a high-end desktop. AMD says boxed versions of its Threadripper 7000 Pro CPUs will be available alongside the non-Pro models. Previously, AMD restricted its Pro chips to system builders only.

Below, you can see what the flagship Threadripper 7980X can do compared to a competing Xeon processor. Performance, ironically, doesn’t matter much for consumers, though. Intel doesn’t sell Xeon chips directly to consumers, so you’ll have to spend thousands through a wholesaler to find one. Currently, AMD is the only one that offers this level of computing power to high-end desktop users.

Performance estimates for the Threadripper 7980X CPU.
AMD

Of course, we still expect these chips will be powerful, much more so than anything Intel or AMD currently offers to end users. Threadripper 7000 CPUs are built on the same Zen 4 architecture powering processors as the Ryzen 9 7950X, just with a much higher core cluster.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Qualcomm counters Intel about its performance claims
Qualcomm's CEO presenting Snapdragon X Elite CPUs at Computex 2024.

In the year since Qualcomm first debuted its Snapdragon X Elite, the competition hasn't been silent. Intel released both Meteor Lake and Lunar Lake chips, the latter of which felt like a legitimate response to Qualcomm's advances in battery life and efficiency.

But Qualcomm isn't impressed by Intel's latest offerings.

Read more
Intel’s new Arrow Lake CPUs can still consume a ton of power
Pins on Core i9-12900K.

Intel has made a big deal about the efficiency of its upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs, which are looking to earn a spot among the best processors when they release later this week. Some early benchmark results HXL on X (formerly Twitter) show that the CPUs can still draw a ton of power if you stray from Intel's default power settings, however.

The post, which you can see below, shows the Core Ultra 9 285K peaking at 370 watts of power draw in Cinebench R23's multi-core test. The CPU itself is blacked-out, but you can tell it's the Core Ultra 9 285K from the 24 cores picked up by Cinebench. The Core Ultra 9 285K has a maximum turbo power of 250W, according to Intel, and a base power of 125W.

Read more
Intel is bringing back one of its most frustrating types of CPUs
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

Intel's new Arrow Lake CPUs are a big deal. They utilize an entirely new architecture and come with a new socket, which will help them compete for a spot among the best processors. However, it looks like some upcoming Core 200-series CPUs (the non-Ultra versions) might not use the Arrow Lake/Lunar Lake architecture at all -- they might be rebranded CPUs sporting older CPU tech.

The assumption comes from results in the Crossmark benchmark that were posted to Bapco and first pointed out by Everest on X (formerly Twitter). The result shows the Core 5 210H, but it's not the performance that's interesting. It's the specs. The result shows that the CPU comes with eight cores and 12 threads. That's the rub. Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake don't come with Hyper-Threading, so each core only comes with a single thread.

Read more