Skip to main content

Comcast doesn't like its customers using their own routers, and it's fighting back

It’s rare that you hear a positive story about the business practices of American mass media corporation Comcast, and the latest news item doing the rounds doesn’t break from that tradition. Customers are reporting that the company is injecting its own ads into their Web browsers.

On the surface, this might seem like just another addition to the list of frustrations Comcast users are expected to endure on a daily basis. However, the product being advertised and the strategy underpinning this campaign are noxious enough to set this apart from the now-standard tales of the company’s disregard for its customers.

Recommended Videos

Like many ISPs, Comcast makes a mint by charging broadband subscribers a rental fee for its standard router. However, canny users can dodge these extra charges by purchasing their own equipment, which typically will cost far less and provide a better online experience.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Comcast has taken note of this practice and is now doing its utmost to fight back. Users surfing the Web on a Comcast connection while using their own router will now be faced with advertisements encouraging them to use an approved modem, according to a report from BGR.

There is no way to opt out of this marketing, and the pop-up ads will be displayed until the user’s router is replaced with a stock Comcast modem. Even better, advertisements are apparently being pushed on tablets and smartphones connected to the network, not just computers — there can be no escape from your ISP overlords.

Last November, Comcast was criticized for implementing data caps applicable to all streaming TV services apart from its own brand. The company’s continued campaign of ill-will toward its customers helped make it the most hated broadband provider in America, according to FCC complaints compiled late last year.

Brad Jones
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
This one feature could prevent motion sickness, but the Vision Pro doesn’t have it
A divided image shows an Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest 3.

A new study on virtual reality comfort suggests that some of the best VR headsets have a feature that can help prevent motion sickness. Also known as simulator sickness, the problem is due to a mismatch between what you see in a head-mounted display (HMD) and what your body feels in reality.

It’s well known that gamers prefer higher frames per second (fps) to be able to react more quickly and aim with greater accuracy. According to a recent study, though, a faster refresh rate can also reduce the chances you’ll experience nausea or vertigo after playing a VR game with lots of motion.

Read more
The RTX 4080 Super doesn’t move the needle — and it doesn’t need to
The RTX 4080 Super graphics card sitting on a pink background.

I suspect the RTX 4080 Super will be disappointing to some people. That doesn't make much sense, considering the RTX 4080 Super will replace the base RTX 4080, but for a market fixated on generational improvements and small percentage wins, it looks like a disappointing GPU.

Nvidia set the bar low, claiming performance improvements in the low single digits. The tests I ran for our RTX 4080 Super review show even smaller gains -- around 1% on average, often rounded up from less than a single percentage point. So, what's so super about this supposed Super refresh?

Read more
I’m a VR enthusiast. Here’s why the Vision Pro doesn’t excite me
A person wears an Apple Vision Pro in a dim room.

For over a decade, I've eagerly read about Apple AR glasses and VR headset leaks, patent documents, and rumors. I've always believed that if any company had the resources to bring us into the future I've been waiting for, it's Apple. But now that the Vision Pro is nearly here, I've lost much of my excitement for Apple's first extended reality device.

I'll purposely avoid the easy targets. We all know a $3,500 Vision Pro is shockingly expensive. But that may not be an issue for some people.We've also heard many stories of discomfort becoming an issue, even in a half-hour demo of the Vision Pro. That's a problem for some people, but VR enthusiasts like myself are used to heavy headsets. I won't challenge Apple's decision to put digital eyes on the front of the headset.

Read more