Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Intel’s new Arrow Lake CPUs can still consume a ton of power

Pins on Core i9-12900K.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Intel has made a big deal about the efficiency of its upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs, which are looking to earn a spot among the best processors when they release later this week. Some early benchmark results HXL on X (formerly Twitter) show that the CPUs can still draw a ton of power if you stray from Intel’s default power settings, however.

The post, which you can see below, shows the Core Ultra 9 285K peaking at 370 watts of power draw in Cinebench R23’s multi-core test. The CPU itself is blacked-out, but you can tell it’s the Core Ultra 9 285K from the 24 cores picked up by Cinebench. The Core Ultra 9 285K has a maximum turbo power of 250W, according to Intel, and a base power of 125W.

Recommended Videos

5.6+4.9

Source: QQ pic.twitter.com/YuY1l0z92K

— HXL (@9550pro) October 21, 2024

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

There’s a little more to the story than the maximum power draw, however. As you can see from the result, the CPU reached 46,289 points in the test. That’s one of the highest scores we’ve ever seen. For context, AMD’s recent Ryzen 9 9950X scored 42,707 points in our testing. Even more impressive, the Core Ultra 9 285K is pulling off that level of a performance improvement with 24 threads compared to the 32 available to the Ryzen 9 9950X.

According to VideoCardz, this isn’t the performance you should expect out of the box. The outlet claims the result here is for the Core Ultra 9 285K without a power limit, which you should be able to configure in the BIOS. At the default power settings, the score should be slightly above 42,000 points, at least according to a handful of leaked benchmarks.

Intel has already confirmed that, with the Core Ultra 9 285K, PL1 equals PL2. Intel defines various power levels for its CPUs, and the Core Ultra 9 285K is no different. PL1 is the maximum turbo power, while PL2 is the maximum turbo power over a short term. For the Core Ultra 9 285K, that means the CPU will stay at 250W under maximum boost, at least with Intel’s default power settings. As we’ve seen with CPUs like the Core i9-14900K, however, there’s a good chance motherboard makers will allow you to remove the power limits for higher performance.

The result shared by HXL likely has the power limits removed. That’s a positive sign, allowing enthusiasts with high-end systems to get much higher performance with adequate cooling. There’s a good chance we won’t see this level of performance from most systems, though.

Intel is still recovering from its instability fiasco with the Core i9-13900K and Core i9-14900K, which was related, at least in part, to unlimited power limits in the BIOS. Given the months-long issue, there’s a strong chance Intel has pushed motherboard brands to abide by its default power settings for Arrow Lake CPUs, at least for the settings out of the box.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
The sales numbers for Intel’s new chips are just depressing
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's latest Arrow Lake-based Core Ultra 200S processors have been off to a rocky debut, receiving middling reviews from hardware testers, including from our own testing.

But according to recent sales data from Mindfactory, Germany’s leading online PC hardware retailer, not a single Core Ultra 200-series CPU has been sold so far. Meanwhile, AMD continues to dominate with 95% of Mindfactory’s CPU market share.

Read more
5 CPUs you should buy instead of the Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K socketed into a motherboard.

The Core Ultra 9 285K arrived with a thud. It's an interesting, and sometimes very impressive, processor, but it's not necessarily a good one. Stacked up against some of the best processors, the Core Ultra 9 285K struggles in gaming and even falls behind in critical productivity apps, which isn't a great start for Intel's latest generation.

Thankfully, there are some excellent alternatives. I've reviewed just about every CPU that Intel and AMD have released in the past several generations, and I've rounded up five processors that match, and often beat, the Core Ultra 9 285K -- sometimes even for a lower price.
Core i9-14900K

Read more
AMD vs. Intel: which makes the best CPUs?
Pads on the bottom of the Ryzen 9 7950X.

When it comes to desktop and laptop processors, the two biggest names in town are Intel and AMD. Qualcomm is making inroads, but if you want peak performance, Intel and AMD make the best processors for gaming and serious productivity.

Still, it's not all sunshine and rainbows for these industry titans. AMD's most recent Ryzen 9000 CPUs were met with a lukewarm reception, but then Intel's Core Ultra 200-series were even less impressive. It may be up to X3D CPUs and turbo modes to save the day.

Read more