Skip to main content

Intel still thinks ARM is an insignificant threat

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger delivers the Day 1 closing keynote at IAA Mobility.
Intel

We’ve recently heard that Nvidia and AMD may soon be ready to launch their own ARM-based client processors. That, combined with predictions that ARM chips might account for up to 30% of the PC market in just a few years, sounds like worrying information for rivals. However, Intel appears to be anything but worried as it rides the high of its surprisingly good earnings. Is the threat of ARM chips really as insignificant as Intel’s CEO makes it out to be?

Right now, Intel dominates the client CPU market by a large margin, although AMD also makes some of the best processors and is a formidable competitor in its own right. Either way, both companies base their chips on the x86 system architecture. However, Microsoft has taken great interest in the ARM architecture over the years, and both AMD and Nvidia will soon be able to jump in. Until 2024, Qualcomm has an exclusive deal for making ARM-based chips for Windows devices, but when that deal is up, there’s nothing left to stop other manufacturers from making their own chips. With the path cleared and Qualcomm leading the charge, the transition to ARM for Windows machines seems more possible than ever.

Recommended Videos

For Intel, this could spell bad news. ARM has been proven to be successful in Apple’s M1 and M2 silicon, so it makes sense that other tech giants might want to capitalize on that. However, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger seemed to be unbothered by the idea during a recent earnings call with investors.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

“ARM and Windows client alternatives, generally they’ve been relegated to pretty insignificant roles in the PC business. We take all our competition seriously, but I think history is our guide here. We don’t see these as potentially being all that significant overall,” said Gelsinger.

Those are some big words considering that there have been many reports of ARM architecture growing significantly over the next few years. Market research firm Canalys predicted that ARM chips will make up around 30% of all PCs by 2026, while Microsoft pins it at around 25% by 2027. That’s not to mention the fact that Intel already lost its presence entirely on Mac to Apple’s own ARM chips.

An ARM processor.
ARM

At the same time, in a contradictory manner, Gelsinger seems to see some potential in ARM in relation to Intel’s own fabs. “Thinking about other alternative architectures like ARM, we also say ‘wow, what a great opportunity for our foundry business,'” he said during the call.

Overall, things are going well for Intel. According to Reuters, Intel has increased its revenue forecast for the third quarter of 2023, going up from $14.6 billion to $15.6 billion. Intel also expects a rise in profit per share, going up to about 44 cents from the previously estimated 32 cents.

Part of this is because the PC market is finally rebounding, with sales seemingly having reached a point of stability after the downward trend we’ve been seeing for a while now. While the data for the third quarter still shows a slight decline in the client PC market for Intel, the drop is a lot smaller than it was previously, falling by 3% to $7.9 billion.

If Intel’s predictions are wrong and ARM does, indeed, wrestle up to 30% of the PC client market away from its competitors, we might see a lot of variety in devices that operate using a system on a chip (SoC). The PC gaming sphere will likely remain unchanged, but it would be interesting to see SoCs built by AMD, Nvidia, and Qualcomm all competing against Intel silicon.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
The state of GPUs is about to drastically change
Several GPUs sitting next to each other.

Get ready -- the list of the best graphics cards is going to look a lot different in the next couple of months. For the first time, Nvidia, AMD, and Intel are set to launch new generations within weeks of each other. Whatever you know about the three major players is about to change. Not only are we getting new generations but there are also shifts in strategy between Nvidia and AMD, tariffs to contend with, and next-gen AI features like FSR 4 in the pipeline.

Over the next few months, everything we currently know about the current slate of GPUs will change -- that much I can say for sure. I'm here to not only catch you up to speed on the past 12 months of leaks, rumors, reports, and confirmations, but also distill all of that information to get a better grasp on the GPU market of 2025. A lot is changing -- some good and some bad -- but one thing is undeniable: We're standing on the edge of an exciting new era for PC gaming.
The easy one: Nvidia

Read more
Nvidia CEO in 1997: ‘We need to kill Intel’
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang at GTC

Those headline above includes strong words from the maker of the best graphics cards you can buy, and they have extra significance considering where Nvidia sits today in relation to Intel. But in 1997, things were a bit different. The quote comes from the upcoming book The Nvidia Way, written by columnist Tae Kim, and was shared as part of an excerpt ahead of the book's release next month.

The words from Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang came as part of an all-hands meeting at the company in 1997 following the launch of the RIVA 128. This was prior to the release of the GeForce 256, when Nvidia finally coined the term "GPU," and it was a precarious time for the new company. Shortly following the release of the RIVA 128, Intel launched its own i740, which came with an 8MB frame buffer. The RIVA 128 came with only a 4MB frame buffer.

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more