Skip to main content

Intel ‘disgustingly’ rejected some faulty CPU returns, YouTuber says

Intel processors next to each other.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Intel has finally broken its silence on the instability issues plaguing 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs over the last few months, but it seems we’ve only gotten a half answer to the problem. Gamer’s Nexus posted a video breaking down what the YouTube channel called “Intel’s biggest fuckup” to date and showcasing how the problem goes beyond the reasoning Intel shared this week.

If you’re not up to speed, Intel posted a message on its forums pinning blame for instability on improper voltage requests within the CPU microcode. Basically, the processor was getting improper power, leading to instability and degradation within the CPU. That’s not the only problem with 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs, however. Some CPUs are impacted by a manufacturing defect that isn’t fixable with a microcode update, and Intel didn’t address that in its public statement.

Recommended Videos

Instead, it only addressed the manufacturing error in a Reddit thread after the forum post. It’s a strange split considering how much more severe a hardware-level defect is compared to something that can be fixed with a microcode update.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Gamer’s Nexus originally broke the story on the manufacturing defect. Oxidation occurred within some early Intel 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs in the VIAs, which are interconnects between various layers of a silicon wafer. Intel says it addressed this issue in 2023 with manufacturing improvements and claims “only a small number of instability reports” point back to the manufacturing error.

The problem is that at least some CPU return requests were rejected when Intel knew about this manufacturing issue, but didn’t make that information public. Alderon Games claims its server providers had returns rejected by Intel even after the manufacturing defect was known. Gamer’s Nexus claims at least some business-to-business and business-to-consumer returns were also “somewhat disgustingly, from my view point” rejected.

You may recall that Alderon Games said it could lose upwards of $100K in lost players due to Intel’s instability issue, and it isn’t the only game publisher claiming massive problems with Intel’s chips.

Although improper voltages seems to be the main driving force behind instability issues on Intel’s 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs, there are other factors at play. One issue is oxidation, but Gamer’s Nexus says there could be other contributing factors as well. Intel says it has addressed the oxidation issue, but it has yet to clarify the date range of affected processors. It also hasn’t publicly said it will honor all return requests for processors impacted by the oxidation issue.

Intel’s microcode update is expected in mid-August, which the company says will solve the instability problems across its 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs. There are still a lot of lingering questions about what this microcode update will do. It could impact performance, for example, or it could expose a larger instability problem that goes beyond voltages. For now, all we can do is wait.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
5 CPUs you should buy instead of the Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K socketed into a motherboard.

The Core Ultra 9 285K arrived with a thud. It's an interesting, and sometimes very impressive, processor, but it's not necessarily a good one. Stacked up against some of the best processors, the Core Ultra 9 285K struggles in gaming and even falls behind in critical productivity apps, which isn't a great start for Intel's latest generation.

Thankfully, there are some excellent alternatives. I've reviewed just about every CPU that Intel and AMD have released in the past several generations, and I've rounded up five processors that match, and often beat, the Core Ultra 9 285K -- sometimes even for a lower price.
Core i9-14900K

Read more
Not this again: Intel Arrow Lake may have instability issues
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's Arrow Lake is just a couple of days from hitting the market, and we've been inundated with various reports and leaked benchmarks. Today's news doesn't sound good, though. YouTuber Moore's Law Is Dead reports that Arrow Lake, also referred to as Core Ultra 200-S, may have some instability issues -- much like what we've seen Intel battle for months on end with Raptor Lake.

Before we dive in, keep in mind that all of this is yet to be confirmed, and we're mere days away from finding out whether it's true or not. However, it could give some buyers a reason to hold off and read the reviews before preordering the CPUs. Moore's Law Is Dead talked about various reviewers and tech YouTubers who had something bad to say about Arrow Lake's stability. The issues are twofold: A wild discrepancy between benchmarks, and running into crashes.

Read more
Intel’s new Arrow Lake CPUs can still consume a ton of power
Pins on Core i9-12900K.

Intel has made a big deal about the efficiency of its upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs, which are looking to earn a spot among the best processors when they release later this week. Some early benchmark results HXL on X (formerly Twitter) show that the CPUs can still draw a ton of power if you stray from Intel's default power settings, however.

The post, which you can see below, shows the Core Ultra 9 285K peaking at 370 watts of power draw in Cinebench R23's multi-core test. The CPU itself is blacked-out, but you can tell it's the Core Ultra 9 285K from the 24 cores picked up by Cinebench. The Core Ultra 9 285K has a maximum turbo power of 250W, according to Intel, and a base power of 125W.

Read more