Skip to main content

The performance downgrade made to the M4 Pro that no one is talking about

Someone using a MacBook Pro M4.
Chris Hagan / Digital Trends

I’ve spent this whole week testing the new M4 chip, specifically the M4 Pro in both the Mac mini and 16-inch MacBook Pro. They are fantastic, impressive chips, but in my testing, I noticed something pretty surprising about the way they run that I haven’t seen others talk much about. I’m talking about the pretty significant change Apple made in this generation to power modes.

First off, Apple has extended the different power modes to the “Pro” level chips for the first time, having kept it as an exclusive for Max in the past. The three power modes, found in System Settings, are the following: Low Power, Automatic, and High Power. The interesting thing, however, is that in my testing, the Low Power drops performance far more this time around.

Recommended Videos
Low Power Automatic High Power
Cinebench R24 (single-core) 154 166 178
Cinebench R24 (multi-core) 765 1622 1707
Cinebench R24 (GPU) 6039 9222 9294

The scores shown above came from on the M4 Pro Mac mini in Cinebench R24. The difference between modes in single-core is closer to what I’d expect, and closer to what they’ve been in previous generations. We’re looking at a 13% higher score for the High Power mode than the Low Power mode.

Multi-core is where things get wild though. With the M4 Pro, you can see just how big of a disparity there is when running the system in Low Power. This Mac mini is 55% faster in High Power than in Low Power. That’s not much higher than the scores we see on the base M3 or M1 Pro chips. This massive drop in performance is also present on the M4 Pro MacBook Pro.

For comparison’s sake, I ran this same test on the previous-gen M3 Max MacBook Pro. There, the High Power mode is only 33% faster in multi-core performance than in Low Power. In fact, although the M4 Pro gets an 8% faster score in multi-core than the M3 Max in High Power mode, the M3 Max is actually 27% faster in Low Power mode.

Someone using a MacBook Pro at a desk.
Chris Hagan / Digital Trends

Of course, this won’t cause any wonky performance changes for most people, since Automatic is the default mode, and Apple has kept the performance scaling between Automatic and High Power modes unchanged.

I also haven’t tested the M4 Max yet, so it’s possible that Apple the lower performance in the Low Power mode is exclusive to the M4 Pro. Maybe it’s exclusive to the “Pro” chips.

One possible explanation could be to optimize the efficiency curve. In order to stay at a reasonable power budget in Low Power mode, Apple may have needed to clamp down the cores, which would explain why the impact is so much stronger on multi-core than on single-core.

I’ll be curious to see when I eventually get my hands on an M4 Max. Apple doesn’t seem to have distributed many M4 Max units for review, so very few have been tested so far.

The other question that remains is whether that Low Power mode extends battery life in the MacBook Pro more than it did in the past. Apple claims that these new M4 chips get extra battery life over their predecessors, but didn’t explain where that extended life came from. The size of the batteries hasn’t changed over the previous generation, after all.

If it’s true that the more restricted Low Power mode was turned on during battery life testing, it could result in some extra battery life that wasn’t there before. That might sound like Apple would be fudging the numbers a bit to increase battery life claims, but in the experience of the user, that might not matter. So long as they know that when they’re on battery and using Low Power mode, they’re getting less than half the performance out of the M4 Pro.

Luke Larsen
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Luke Larsen is the Senior Editor of Computing, managing all content covering laptops, monitors, PC hardware, Macs, and more.
The M3 MacBook Air is gone for good — but the M2 is a survivor worth considering
The screen of the MacBook Air on a table.

With the introduction of the new M4 MacBook Air, it's time to say goodbye to some of the older models. This time, both the M3 and the M2 MacBook Air will disappear from Apple Store shelves. Unlike the M3, however, the M2 isn't being discontinued completely -- it will still be available at certain retailers.

This gives people a chance to get an amazing laptop (the laptop I'm writing on right now) at a really good price. TechRadar has already spotted certain M2 MacBook Air configurations on Amazon selling for as low as $699. That's 30% off MSRP and 30% less than the new M4 model.

Read more
M3 Ultra vs. M4 Max: Which is better? Benchmarks can’t tell either
2025 Mac Studio

Apple surprised us with its announcement of the new Mac Studio this week, and confused us with its chip choices -- the M4 Max and the M3 Ultra. It's hard enough to tell which chip is more powerful just from their names, but according to early benchmarks, it's also hard to tell from their CPU performance.

https://x.com/VadimYuryev/status/1897849477706481701?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1897849477706481701%7Ctwgr%5E8073e41e643559d3c995c3a698fc2b5523a61222%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F9to5mac.com%2F2025%2F03%2F06%2Fm3-ultra-m4-max-chip-benchmark%2F

Read more
The new Mac Studio absolutely baffles me in one key way
Apple Mac Studio with M4 Max and M3 Ultra chips and two Apple Studio Display monitors.

Way back when Steve Jobs returned to Apple and saved it from bankruptcy, he implemented his famous product quadrant: Apple should have desktops and laptops for consumers and professionals. These four categories should contain just one of the best Macs each -- no more, no less.

The idea was that you should be able to instantly differentiate each device and know who it’s for and what it does, and it worked incredibly effectively. Yet when I look at the new Mac Studio that Apple unveiled today, I get the feeling that Steve Jobs would be most displeased.

Read more