Skip to main content

Shigeru Miyamoto is not retiring, but his role at Nintendo may change

shigeru-miyamoto-hands-up
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It appears that we’ve lost the ability to read. A recently published Wired article titled “Nintendo’s Miyamoto Stepping Down, Working on Smaller Games” has led to a barrage of reports that Shigeru Miyamoto is retiring from Nintendo, a fact that is not supported by the legendary game designer’s statements in the article.

The controversy seems to stem from the use of the word “stepping down” in the headline and Miyamoto’s tongue-in-cheek declaration “I’m going to retire, I’m going to retire” in the Wired interview. However, much like a soundbite can be taken out of context, reading Miyamoto’s entire statement indicates that he is not planning to retire, but only change his role in Nintendo to focus more on game design and let the company’s younger designers work without having to get his approval on everything. 

“Inside our office, I’ve been recently declaring, ‘I’m going to retire, I’m going to retire,'” Miyamoto told Wired through his interpreter. “I’m not saying that I’m going to retire from game development altogether. What I mean by retiring is, retiring from my current position….What I really want to do is be in the forefront of game development once again myself. Probably working on a smaller project with even younger developers. Or I might be interested in making something that I can make myself, by myself. Something really small….In other words, I’m not intending to start from things that require a five-year development time.”

“The reason why I’m stressing that is that unless I say that I’m retiring, I cannot nurture the young developers,” continued Miyamoto. “After all, if I’m there in my position as it is, then there’s always kind of a relationship. And the young guys are always kind of in a situation where they have to listen to my ideas. But I need some people who are growing up much more than today.”

shigeru-miyamoto-master-swordFrom reading these quotes, we get the impression that Miyamoto simply wants to get back to game design himself. In his current role, he overseas all of Nintendo’s major projects and spends a large amount of his time approving and advising Nintendo’s many developers. From his statements, we imagine that he’d like to get back to the front lines and do some intimate game designing like he used to in the 1980s and 1990s. It also sounds as if he believes in Nintendo’s younger crop of designers, but doesn’t believe they will reach their potential if he is always around to coddle them.

Of course, once word spread that “Miyamoto is retiring” Nintendo’s PR team has been making the rounds doing damage control, vehemently denying that the creator of Mario and Zelda is retiring. 

“This is absolutely not true,” a spokeswoman for Nintendo told Reuters. “There seems to have been a misunderstanding. He has said all along that he wants to train the younger generation. He has no intention of stepping down. Please do not be concerned.”

The subject of retirement isn’t entirely unjustified. Miyamoto is 59 and will not be around forever, as his statements imply. It sounds as if, quite thoughtfully, he is preparing Nintendo for the day when he might not be around, which shows how much he cares about the company and its future. But don’t expect him to leave anytime soon. Personally, I’m quite excited to see what a focused Miyamoto can create if he’s unhooked from some of his massive creative responsibility at Nintendo. 

Jeffrey Van Camp
Former Digital Trends Contributor
As DT's Deputy Editor, Jeff helps oversee editorial operations at Digital Trends. Previously, he ran the site's…
NYT Connections: hints and answers for Friday, March 7
New York Times' Connection puzzle open in the NYT Games app on iOS.

Connections is one of the best puzzle games from the New York Times. The game tasks you with categorizing a pool of 16 words into four secret (for now) groups by figuring out how the words relate to each other. The puzzle resets every night at midnight and each new puzzle has a varying degree of difficulty. Just like Wordle, you can keep track of your winning streak and compare your scores with friends.

Some days are trickier than others — just like other NYT Games favorites The Mini and Strands. If you're having a little trouble solving today's puzzle, check out our Connections tips and tricks guide for some good strategies or check out the hints for today's Connections puzzle below. And if you still can't get it, we'll tell you today's answers at the very end.
How to play Connections

Read more
NYT Strands today: hints, spangram and answers for Friday, March 7
NYT Strands logo.

Strands is a brand new daily puzzle from the New York Times. A trickier take on the classic word search, you'll need a keen eye to solve this puzzle.

Like Wordle, Connections, and the Mini Crossword, Strands can be a bit difficult to solve some days. There's no shame in needing a little help from time to time. If you're stuck and need to know the answers to today's Strands puzzle, check out the solved puzzle below.
How to play Strands
You start every Strands puzzle with the goal of finding the "theme words" hidden in the grid of letters. Manipulate letters by dragging or tapping to craft words; double-tap the final letter to confirm. If you find the correct word, the letters will be highlighted blue and will no longer be selectable.

Read more
NYT Mini Crossword today: puzzle answers for Friday, March 7
The Mini open in the NYT Games app on iOS.

Love crossword puzzles but don't have all day to sit and solve a full-sized puzzle in your daily newspaper? That's what The Mini is for!

A bite-sized version of the New York Times' well-known crossword puzzle, The Mini is a quick and easy way to test your crossword skills daily in a lot less time (the average puzzle takes most players just over a minute to solve). While The Mini is smaller and simpler than a normal crossword, it isn't always easy. Tripping up on one clue can be the difference between a personal best completion time and an embarrassing solve attempt.

Read more