Skip to main content

Why you shouldn’t always trust manufacturer’s lumens specs

A huge focus of the AV world has been on brightness, and for good reason. Without an adequately bright image, especially in a room awash with ambient light, your displays picture will look washed out and seeing detail is difficult. With projectors, the amount of brightness it can produce will also determine how big of an image it can project.

Brightness is also one half of contrast (the other being black level), which is the most important aspect of a picture because of the way our visual system developed to survive in the world. While the amount of brightness a TV or projector produces isn’t a life or death situation (as much as we video reviewers think it might be), it’s important that we know what we’re getting from a product we’re looking to buy. Unfortunately, that isn’t always the case.

Recommended Videos

Let’s take a look at what these specs actually are, and how to make sure you’re getting the most out of them.

What is a lumen, anyway?

You’ll come across different terms as you read about brightness performance of displays — both from reviews and manufacturer specs. Our goal as reviewers is to provide you, the reader, with an accurate representation of how a product performs in the real world as opposed to what the specs say. (Specs can be useful, but it doesn’t mean they’re always entirely accurate.) So what’s the difference between a lumen, a nit, a lux, and a foot lambert?

  • Lumens (lm): The amount of visible light emitted by a source in all directions. It’s used to measure the light output of projectors and bulbs. Since lumens are the measure of light from the source, they don’t include screen reflectivity.
  • Lux (lx): We sometimes see lux in relation to projector measurements. It’s a measure of illuminance, or the amount of light that falls onto a surface. Specifically, one lux is one lumen per square meter.
  • Nits (nt): Digital Trends readers are likely most familiar with nits as a unit of brightness measurement. We use this in the measurement of TVs and other panel displays (like monitors). Like lumens, nits is a representation of light emitted from a display, but from a single direction and not all directions. This is also sometimes referred to a cd/m2 (candelas per meter squared).
  • Foot-lambert (ft-L): This isn’t seen as much in the consumer space, but is another form of luminance measurement, like lumens and nits. It’s used by the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) to set brightness standards for theaters.

When it comes to pure brightness capability of a projector, lumens is the important number.

Different types of lumen measurements

When you look at different lumen measurements that projector companies might use, not all are created equal. There’s ANSI lumens, ISO lumens, CVIA lumens, LED lumens, and just plain old lumens. So which ones are the best to pay attention to?

Both ANSI lumens and ISO lumens are standardized through different organizations — the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the International Standard for Organization (ISO). The specific ISO standard is ISO21118. There are claims of an ability to convert one to the other (an AWOL Vision blog post points to a 1 ANSI to 0.8 ISO comparison, while an Anker Nebula post uses 1 ANSI to 1.045 ISO), but there is no official conversion. In my experience, the two are very similar, and close to a 1:1.

ANSI has been the primary standard, although many companies and websites are switching over to the ISO standard. CVIA lumens are another standard created by the China Video Industry Association, but has not caught on worldwide yet.

LED lumens are used specifically by LED projector manufacturers, but are not a standardized form of measurement. The reasoning behind those companies using the term is that the light from LEDs looks brighter to our eyes than measurement equipment. So the LED lumens number is the estimated

The problems with the standards

The lumens landscape was the wild west for a long time — and to some extent still is. Epson has spent time and money trying to fix this with lawsuits against companies that Epson claims are falsely advertising brightness output — including Anker, AWOL Vision, JmGo. So now that we have standards everything is fine and totally accurate in the projector lumen world, right? Well, not exactly.

Even with the standards, a projector can be considered within spec but still be up to 20% under the number that they publish. That means a 2,000 ANSI lumen projector could actually put out 1,600 lumens and be considered all well and good.

Add to it that the lumens numbers posted by manufacturers are almost always with the projector in its brightest mode — usually Vivid, or Dynamic, or something with a closely related synonym. The problem with these modes is that they aren’t generally color accurate, and often have a green tint to the picture. If you switch the picture mode into Movie or Cinema (which you absolutely should), you can expect a lower lumens output. Sometimes by as much as 50% of the published spec.

Taking all of that into account, having the standardized forms of measurements are still incredibly useful and worthwhile to pay attention to. Companies are more accurately reporting what their projectors are capable of and reviewers are holding them to it. Finding third parties that have done scientific measurements is a great way to check what you’re actually getting out of a projector instead of just believing what a manufacturer says. Just keep in mind that even then, what you get on your screen might not be what’s listed on the box.

John Higgins
John Higgins is the Senior Editor of A/V at Digital Trends, leading the team in coverage of all manner of audio and video.
Why Apple (still) shouldn’t make a streaming device for cheapskates
Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire TV and Chromecast With Google TV.

The Internet — that is folks who likely spend too much time on it — loves nothing more than to speculate about what Apple may do. Or even better, what Apple should do. The more foolish among us are sold bold as to say what Apple will do.

Today, let us be so bold. (And possibly foolish.) There has been a decent amount of scuttlebutt regarding the possibility of a low-cost Apple TV dongle. And on one hand, that makes a whole lot of sense. Apple's current TV-centric hardware, the aptly named Apple TV 4K (not to be confused with the Apple TV app, which we'll come to in a second, or the Apple TV+ streaming service, which we'll also touch on) is a fine piece of kit, as they say in the biz. It's overpowered for what it does, meaning that it streams shows and movies and the like really well, without any sort of lag or hesitation. It has just about every spec you could want. It serves as a HomeKit hub. It plays music and shows photos and allows you to seamlessly mirror your iPhone or iPad or Mac to your TV. The only problem is that it is several times more expensive than what most folks are buying these days, edging toward $200.

Read more
Baseball is back! Here’s why you can’t watch it
yahoo sports app update mlb major league baseball safe

Hear ye! Hear ye! This proclamation comes forth from the Commissioner of Baseball on this, the year of our Lord 2022 on the seventh day of April. Teams shall commence in sportsman's battle across this great nation of ours forthwith, and continue for every day until the completion of the season 162 days hence.

You might be wondering, "what's with the language?" Well, I wanted to communicate with you in the language of the folks who are in charge of baseball broadcasting rights. That's to say, old as hell. Ancient, even. Baseball broadcast rights, and specifically those pertaining to online streaming blackouts, are an issue with which I have been contending basically since the first smartphone came out that could handle a video stream. Put simply, they suck. How badly do they suck? Glad you asked! To answer that, allow me to tell you about the great state of Iowa.

Read more
You shouldn’t be shocked that the HomePod Mini has a hidden sensor
Apple HomePod mini in hand

Am I surprised that the Apple HomePod Mini is hiding a stowaway inside of it? Not really. After a report surfaced recently about how Apple’s latest smart speaker has a sensor tucked away inside of it to measure temperature and humidity, it’s natural to speculate on the reason why it's there in the first place -- and more importantly, why it's not active. This comes as no shock to me, mainly because the HomePod Mini isn’t the first (and won't be the last) smart home gadget to hide away inactive sensors.
Inactive sensors are common
Temperature and humidity sensors are used for a number of purposes. In the case of the HomePod Mini, one would suspect that it could be used to monitor if the speaker is overheating. However, since it’s actually positioned away from the main components of the speaker, it leads one to assume that it could be used to monitor the ambient temperature and humidity of where it’s placed. This brings me to the point about inactive sensors -- they’re more common than you think.

The example that first comes to mind are the various inactive sensors in some of LIFX’s smart light bulbs. These sensors were deliberately placed in its products, mainly to future-proof its product line. In one example I was shown during a meeting at CES 2020, an accelerometer embedded inside one of its light bulbs allowed me to turn the bulb on or off with a subtle tap of the lamp -- while another sensor, an ambient light sensor, could be accessed to intelligently turn the bulb on or off at sunrise and sunset.

Read more