Skip to main content

Don’t be afraid of the big, bad Apple ‘Touch ID’ hack

iphone fingerprint unlocking texas 5s touchid
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Apple’s Touch ID fingerprint sensor, used to unlock the new iPhone 5S, can be tricked using a “fake finger,” according to a hacker group that claims to have broken the biometric security feature. If true, the hack undermines Apple’s assertions that Touch ID provides stronger security for iPhone users than the iPhone’s 4-digit pin lock – but don’t fret: Touch ID is still a valuable feature.

Before we get into why this isn’t that big of a deal, here’s how the anti-biometrics hacker group, Chaos Computer Club (CCC), successfully bypassed Touch ID, in their own words:

Recommended Videos

First, the fingerprint of the enroled (sic) user is photographed with 2400 dpi resolution. The resulting image is then cleaned up, inverted and laser printed with 1200 dpi onto transparent sheet with a thick toner setting. Finally, pink latex milk or white woodglue is smeared into the pattern created by the toner onto the transparent sheet. After it cures, the thin latex sheet is lifted from the sheet, breathed on to make it a tiny bit moist and then placed onto the sensor to unlock the phone. This process has been used with minor refinements and variations against the vast majority of fingerprint sensors on the market.

As you can see, the hack requires that whoever wants access to the device has the ability to take a high-resolution scan of the phone owner’s fingerprint, then print that out using a high-res scanner – not exactly an easy feat, or one that is easily repeatable in everyday life (as opposed to CCC’s intentional test of the security system, in which all parties were presumably complicit). Still, according to CCC spokesman Frank Rieger, the fact that this hack is possible should dispel “the illusions people have about fingerprint biometrics.”

“The public should no longer be fooled by the biometrics industry with false security claims. Biometrics is fundamentally a technology designed for oppression and control, not for securing everyday device access,” he added.

While it is disappointing that someone was able to trick Touch ID using simple methods, there are a number of reasons to take this hack with a grain of salt.

First, the easy-to-use nature of Touch ID is sure to increase the number of iPhone owners who lock their devices. Before the release of the iPhone 5S, a mere 50 percent of users locked their devices at all. Now that Touch ID is an option, that number will almost certainly increase.

Second, the CCC hack, though doable, is still a giant pain in the ass. Most thieves, I’d guess, do not have the knowledge, skill, tools, patience, or wherewithal to recreate the CCC hack. So if you’re device gets stolen, Touch ID will still do its job just fine.

Third, Touch ID still provides ample protection from the people we most want to keep out: Snooping family member, roommates, co-workers, and other people close to us. On that front, it keeps people out better than the 4-digit pin without the minor hassle of entering the pin every time the device is used.

Finally, as it’s currently configured, it is still possible to access a locked iPhone 5S using only the 4-digit pin – just swipe the screen, and the 4-digit pin unlock option appears, no fingerprint needed. Apple can, presumably, add an option to iOS 7 that allows a user to require both the fingerprint scan and the 4-digit pin to unlock the device. Do that, and the CCC hack will no longer work. I’d guess Apple will release this option once more people have become comfortable with Touch ID.

There are other reasons to be concerned about Touch ID. Minnesota Democrat Sen. Al Franken recently detailed some of them in a letter about the feature to Apple CEO Tim Cook. But the CCC hack just isn’t something to lose sleep over.

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
I don’t think Apple wants me to buy the new iPad Pro
Someone using the new M4 iPad Pro with a creator app.

There are days when I am proud of the things I create, and then there are days like today when I watch an Apple iPad Pro reveal event. Seeing what the new 2024 iPad Pro can do made me feel like the things I’ve creatively achieved are the equivalent of holding a piece of chalk in my clenched fist and scratching a stick figure onto a cave wall.

I simply would not get close to what it’s capable of, band there’s still a tiny, slightly mad part of me that really wants one of these spectacular new tablets, particularly as it’s still the only way I can get a personal must-have tablet feature. Except, if I also want all the kit with it, the top-spec iPad Pro model will definitely cost me more than $2,000, potentially even up to $3,000. Am I mad enough to spend that much on an iPad?
Go Pro or go home

Read more
The OnePlus 12 has one big advantage over Samsung and Apple
Gray Samsung Galaxy S24 (left), Rose Gold Google Pixel 8, Flowy Emerald OnePlus 12, Green iPhone 15, Titanium Gray iPhone 15 Pro on a pink and red heart blanket.

Samsung Galaxy S24 (left), Google Pixel 8, OnePlus 12, iPhone 15, and iPhone 15 Pro. Christine Romero-Chan / Digital Trends

When you look at smartphones these days, the selection has grown a bit … stale, to say the least. You’ll see phones from top brands like Samsung, Apple, and even Google, but most options look the same — they’re glass slabs.

Read more
Don’t buy a Galaxy S24 Ultra or iPhone 15 Pro Max. Do this instead
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Mint Green color along with a Samsung notebook and a cermaic bowl with lemons.

“Do I need all that?” That’s the question on the mind of shoppers before they splurge a now-standard $1,000 asking price for a top-tier phone in 2024. Ideally, that dilemma should be there. The likes of Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Apple’s iPhone 15 Pro Max have won laurels for a handful of standout features they offer. But you might not need those standout features at all.

I’ve been on that road, and more frequently than I have the temerity to admit. For some reason, regret comes as part of the $1,200 flagship parcel. That's unless your phone is a part of your creative or work process, or you just don’t care and only want the latest and greatest for the vanity of it. A segment like that certainly exists, but that affluent user base doesn’t dictate the journey of a product.

Read more