Skip to main content

Apple Watch Series 7 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic

The Apple Watch Series 7 is the latest iteration in Apple’s pursuit of smartwatch perfection. Contrary to rumors, it retains its elegant “squircle” design and marries it to a range of welcome upgrades. These include a Retina screen that’s 20% larger than the display on the Apple Watch Series 6, 33% faster charging, a more durable glass for its touchscreen, and a 70% brighter always-on screen. On top of this, it includes all of the great health-tracking features of its predecessors, a highly capable processor, and some very slick software.

Apple aficionados would probably tell you it’s the best smartwatch by anyone anywhere. However, others may suggest that Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic gives it a very good run for its money. In contrast to Apple’s flagship wearable, it sports a more traditional design that eschews a squarish shape for a full circle. That said, it still offers a wide range of modern smartwatch features, including comprehensive fitness tracking and a rotating bezel that makes it a joy to use. It is possibly the best smartwatch Samsung has ever made, but how does it fare against the Apple Watch Series 7?

We answer this question by comparing each smartwatch against each other in a head-to-head test.

Specs

Apple Watch Series 7
Samsung Galaxy Watch Classic 4
Display size 41mm: 1.61 inches

45mm: 1.77 inches

42mm: 1.19 inches

46mm: 1.4 inches

Body size 41mm: 41 x 35 x 10.7 mm (1.61 x 1.38 x 0.42 inches)

45mm: 45 x 38 x 10.7 mm (1.77 x 1.50 x 0.42 inches)

42mm: 41.5 x 41.5 x 11.2mm (1.63 x 1.63 x 0.44 inches)

46mm: 45.5 x 45.5 x 11mm (1.79 x 1.79 x 0.43 inches)

Resolution in pixels 41mm: 368 x 448

45mm: 396 x 484

42mm: 396 x 396 pixels (330 ppi)

46mm: 450 x 450 pixels (330 ppi)

Touchscreen 41mm: LTPO OLED Retina
Always-on display45mm: LTPO OLED Retina
Always-on display
42mm: 1.19-inch Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen

46mm: 1.4-inch Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen

Storage 32GB 16GB
Wireless interface Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, NFC, LTE Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, NFC, LTE
Depth 10.7mm 42mm: 11.2 mm

46mm: 11 mm

Blood oxygen sensor
Yes Yes
Accelerometer Yes Yes
Gyroscope Yes Yes
Ambient light sensor Yes Yes
Heart rate sensor Yes Yes
Barometer Yes Yes
GPS Yes Yes
Compass Yes No
Water/dust resistant Yes/Yes (IP6X and ISO standard 22810:2010) Yes/Yes (IP68)
Battery life Up to 18 hours Up to 40 hours (based on Samsung laboratory measurements)
Price From $399 From $350
Availability Apple Samsung
DT review News 4 stars out of 5

Design and display

Heart rate mode on the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Rumors had suggested a design overhaul for the Apple Watch Series 7, but it turns out it looks nigh-on identical to the Apple Watch Series 6. Nonetheless, there are a couple of subtle, yet tangible improvements: The watch’s bezel has been decreased in size by about 40%, meaning that you get 20% more display for your buck compared to the Series 6, as well as 50% more in comparison to the Series 3. This not only makes the watch look a little more impressive, but it also makes it more functional, with the extra real estate allowing for more text and icons to fit inside its display.

As mentioned above, the Samsung Watch 4 Classic apes the more understated design of a traditional watch, as well as that of the Samsung Watch 3. However, it also incorporates narrower bezels than its immediate predecessor, while it refines its strap and buttons compared to the Watch 3, making them fit the watch itself more seamlessly.

The question of which watch is more attractive is highly subjective and debatable, but the same usually can’t be said when it comes to displays. However, both watches are more or less equally matched. The Watch 4 Classic packs a Super AMOLED display, which provides 330 pixels per inch, regardless of whether you go for the 42mm and 46mm model. By contrast, the Watch Series 7 harnesses an LTPO OLED Retina display, which gives you 345 pixels per inch with the 41mm model and 353 PPI for the 45mm version. This slight superiority in terms of pixel count is counteracted by Samsung’s AMOLED display technology, which allows for slightly deeper blacks and richer colors than the Watch Series 7’s OLED tech. As such, you get a great visual experience across both devices.

Both watches present various options when it comes to bands and colors. The Watch 4 Classic comes with casing in either black or silver, while bands come in everything from red to mustard and camel. Likewise, you can get the Apple Watch Series 7 in either aluminum, steel, or titanium casing, while its loops range from sports bands to more luxury nylon and leather variants, for example.

As for durability, it’s worth noting that the Watch 4 Classic carries an IP68 rating, indicating both water and dust resistance. Unfortunately for the Apple Watch, it offers only dust resistance (IP6X), so don’t go dunking it in the bath. On the other hand, its use of sapphire crystal glass should make its display highly scratch and drop-resistant.

Winner: Tie

Performance, battery life, and charging

Surfing workout being tracked on the all new Apple Watch Series 7.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Not only does the Apple Watch Series 7 look very similar to the Series 6, but it also runs on the same Apple S6 chipset. This is a highly capable processor, so it will still get all of your watch-related tasks done without any hassle, but just don’t expect a noticeable performance boost. With the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic, you’ll be running off the new dual-core, 1.18GHz Samsung Exynos W920 processor with 1.5GB of RAM. Our review found that it effortlessly handles its tasks, and even though we haven’t given the Apple Watch a full review yet, we expect that Samsung’s wearable will at least match it for speed, if not perform better.

In terms of charging, Samsung claims you’ll get up to 40 hours of playtime before the Watch 4 Classic requires a recharge. This turns out to be the case in reality only if you use the watch sparingly. If you use its always-on display, use it for tracking your sleep, and just use it frequently in general, it will struggle to complete two whole days before needing a refill. This puts it on a par with the Apple Watch Series 6, which judging by the Apple Watch Series 6, will also struggle to finish a second day if you make use of its full potential. However, Apple has claimed it provides 33% faster charging than its predecessor.

Winner: Tie

Fitness and health-tracking features

Person checking heart rate on the all new Apple Watch Series 7.
Apple

The Apple Watch Series 7 comes with the same sensor array as last year’s model, meaning you get a heart rate sensor, blood oxygen monitor, and an electrocardiogram (ECG), all of which offer general indicators of the state of your health but shouldn’t be regarded as genuine substitutes for qualified medical examinations. Thanks to WatchOS 8, Series 7 also adds an automatic fall-detection feature that runs in the background during workouts and when cycling, sending messages to emergency contacts if you do happen to have an accident. Also due to WatchOS 8, it can now also measure your respiratory rate while sleeping.

Beyond these additions, the fitness- and health-tracking features work as well as ever, providing accurate and reliable data via the simple interfaces of the Health app. The same pretty much goes for the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic, which in contrast to the Apple Watch Series 7, introduces a number of features not previously seen in its line. These include an optical heart rate sensor (8PD), an electrical heart sensor (ECG), and biological impedance analysis (BIA). Together, they enable you to track such things as your sleep, your blood-oxygen level, your blood pressure, and also your body composition (i.e., your body mass index). The watch also supports over 100 different workouts, meaning Samsung’s device is every bit as comprehensive as a fitness tracker as Apple’s.

In other words, this round is another tie.

Winner: Tie

Software and updates

Samsung Health screen, and the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

As mentioned above, the Apple Watch Series 7 operates using WatchOS 8. This brings a variety of workout updates to the table, including the ability to detect when someone begins riding a bike, and also workouts for tai chi and pilates. It also transforms the Breathe app into the Mindfulness app, which adds new sessions and activities to those previously available via Breathe. All in all, it provides a very smooth user experience.

The same can’t always be said from WearOS 3, which the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic uses. It’s generally fast and easy to use, with a range of Google apps that improve the device’s versatility. However, these and other third-party apps don’t always work as well on the watch as they probably should, as our review found that certain apps don’t always run seamlessly, while others you might expect to find aren’t available via GooglePlay.

When combined with the fact that you’ll be better serviced with updates by the Apple Watch Series 7, this difference in overall UX means we have our first round with a clear winner.

Winner: Apple Watch Series 7

Special features

Apple Watch redesigned display and larger keyboard.
Apple

The Apple Watch Series 7’s special feature is its enlarged display, which allows for some enhanced functionality. For example, the watch now lets you use a full on-screen QWERTY keyboard to type messages or commands, with the keyboard also supporting QuickPath (i.e. swipe typing). Another example is that numerous apps (e.g. Calculator, Stopwatch, and Timer) feature redesigned buttons and icons that make using them easier. At the same time, Apple has added a couple of new watch faces that make the most of the bigger, curved screen, such as constantly changing Contour (which highlights the hour of the day, making it bigger than the other hours).

With the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic, you continue to get the rotating bezel that has made previous Galaxy smartwatches such a pleasure to use. It may be a simple feature, but it’s an effective and satisfying way of navigating the device’s interface, letting you scroll through options simply by rotating its edge. Of course, as good as it is, it isn’t a new feature, so we’re calling this round a tie.

Winner: Tie

Price and availability

The Apple Watch Series 7 is available to order from Apple from October 15 onwards. It starts at $399, but can reach as high as $899 if you go for the larger 45mm model with titanium casing, for instance. You’ll also be able to find it from the vast majority of big online retailers.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic begins from $349 for the 42mm model and can go up to $429 if you want the larger 46mm model with a cellular connection. It’s also widely available online.

Winner: Tie

Overall winner: Apple Watch Series 7

Apple Watch Series 7 Announcement Screen.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There’s very little difference between the Apple Watch Series 7 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic in terms of overall, with both watches providing great performance and enviable looks. However, we’ve given this head-to-head to the Series 7 simply by virtue of its superiority in the software department, both in terms of how smoothly its OS runs and in terms of how well it will be supported by updates. Otherwise, the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic provides comparably good health-and-fitness tracking features, a similarly sharp display, and good battery life. It’s your only choice out of these two if you’re an Android person, of course, but if you’re using an iPhone, then the Apple Watch just about edges it.

Simon Chandler
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Simon Chandler is a journalist based in London, UK. He covers technology and finance, contributing to such titles as Digital…
Here’s another hands-on look at the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and One UI 7
The back of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.

Another day, another Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leak. Yesterday, we saw a short video teasing the design of the phone, but we didn't get a full look at the device. A few more images have appeared, all from the same source as yesterday.

Android Authority shared images obtained from Reddit user u/GamingMK, who said they came from yesterday's leaker (a user that has since deleted their account). Additionally, these images show the Galaxy S25 running One UI 7.

Read more
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 may not get the chipset we were expecting
A side-view of a closed Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6.

We’re at the time of year when rumors start to surface about next year’s Samsung devices. The latest one concerns the upcoming Galaxy Z Flip FE and Galaxy Z Flip 7. If true, it’s a significant development.

According to leaker @Jukanlosreve on X, the Galaxy Z Flip FE (Samsung's upcoming budget foldable) is likely to use a Samsung Exynos 2400e chip, the same chip found in the recently introduced Galaxy S24 FE.

Read more
2025 could finally be the year of a budget-friendly Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
A person closing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6.

The idea of a more budget-friendly Samsung clamshell has gained steam as well-known leakers drop more and more hints that a new Galaxy Z Flip is on the way. Today, another leak from someone in the know adds even more credence to that rumor.

Ross Young made a post on X where he suggested that Samsung might release a Z Flip 7 FE in 2025 with the clamshell design fans have waited for. Young has a proven record for accurate leaks, and their work in the supply chain gives him a unique insight into what companies are working on.

Read more