Skip to main content

Stanford study says T-Mobile’s Binge On is illegal

Just a day after announcing the expansion of its Binge On program, T-Mobile may need to consider rolling it back. According to a Stanford University study, the contentious perk for certain Un-carrier subscribers is “likely illegal.” Citing crucial net neutrality rules, Barbara van Schewick, a net neutrality expert and Stanford law professor who penned the study, accused Binge On of limiting user choice, distorting competition, stifling innovation, and harming free speech. “If more ISPs offer similar programs, these harms will only grow worse,” is the damning conclusion.

The study is the latest in a string of bad PR T-Mobile has braved since launching the program three months ago. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and a number of journalists have also raised concerns about the fairness of the program, but the Stanford study may be the most forthcoming to date about the legality of Binge On. The program, which indeed seems popular among its users (T-Mobile reports that customers are watching “more than twice as many hours per day from free services than before”), basically allows users with at least a 3GB data plan to stream video from a growing list of providers for free (or at least, without affecting their data usage). And while that seems like a great perk, it’s really landing John Legere’s company in some hot water.

Recommended Videos

“Binge On violates key net neutrality principles that the Open Internet rules are designed to protect and creates harms to Internet openness that the general conduct rule is meant to prevent,” von Schewick writes. “Taken together, it is likely that Binge On violates the general conduct rule and is therefore illegal.”

Please enable Javascript to view this content

While T-Mobile will doubtless defend to its last breath the legitimacy of its program, critics continue to cast a pall over the carrier’s grand plans. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is investigating the “zero rating” practices employed by Binge On, and with the evidence von Shewick presents, courts may be swayed to make a not so favorable decision.

So binge while you can — who knows if it’ll last?

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
T-Mobile has been fined millions of dollars. Here are all the details
T-Mobile smartphone.

There's an expectation of privacy and security from your mobile provider. That's why a series of T-Mobile data breaches from 2021 through January of this year caused so much concern. Over 130 million customers were affected, and their addresses, dates of birth, and sometimes even Social Security numbers were exposed in the attacks.

T-Mobile has reached a settlement with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding the data breaches. The company is on the hook for $15.75 million in fines, but it is also paying for an additional $15.75 million in infrastructure improvements to improve its cybersecurity. The settlement also includes several actionable steps on T-Mobile's part.

Read more
T-Mobile’s satellite network just set an industry first
Cell phone tower shooting off pink beams with a 5G logo next to it.

Emergency alerts are one of those smartphone features that many people ignore. After all, are they really that useful?

Yes. Yes, they are.

Read more
T-Mobile has been hit with a $60 million fine. Here’s why
Cell phone tower shooting off pink beams with a 5G logo next to it.

T-Mobile, the third-largest carrier in the U.S., has been hit with a $60 million fine by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS). This penalty is related to its failure to follow the terms of a mitigation agreement that T-Mobile agreed to when it acquired Sprint Corp. in 2020.

According to Reuters, Deutsche Telekom, T-Mobile's parent company, failed to prevent and report unauthorized access to sensitive data following the Sprint Corp. acquisition. The unauthorized access occurred in 2020 and 2021 when "information (was) shared from a small number of law enforcement information requests."

Read more