Skip to main content

I don’t think Apple wants me to buy the new iPad Pro

Someone using the new M4 iPad Pro with a creator app.
Apple

There are days when I am proud of the things I create, and then there are days like today when I watch an Apple iPad Pro reveal event. Seeing what the new 2024 iPad Pro can do made me feel like the things I’ve creatively achieved are the equivalent of holding a piece of chalk in my clenched fist and scratching a stick figure onto a cave wall.

Recommended Videos

I simply would not get close to what it’s capable of, band there’s still a tiny, slightly mad part of me that really wants one of these spectacular new tablets, particularly as it’s still the only way I can get a personal must-have tablet feature. Except, if I also want all the kit with it, the top-spec iPad Pro model will definitely cost me more than $2,000, potentially even up to $3,000. Am I mad enough to spend that much on an iPad?

Go Pro or go home

A person holding the iPad Pro 2020.
Andy Boxall / DigitalTrends

I have a 2020 iPad Pro with a Magic Keyboard, which I love. It saw me through the early days of the pandemic and essentially replaced my television for the following years until I moved home. It was “Pro” in the way it came with higher specs, more ability, and a better screen than the cheaper model — and I’ve always felt like it could do everything I want with just a bit of power to spare. But after years of use, the battery isn’t as strong as it used to be, and as it’s the 11-inch version, a larger screen would be nice on any replacement.

Could the new iPad Pro be it, I wondered as Apple CEO Tim Cook said the May 7 event would be the biggest day for the product since its introduction? But from that moment on, I started to feel rather inadequate because Apple went all-out in showing off the new iPad Pro’s impressive professional ability — and completely lost me while doing it.

From achieving incredible artistry using the Apple Pencil to syncing multiple iPhone and iPad cameras together to make movies in Final Cut Pro, the iPad Pro suddenly seemed to rival a Mac Pro as a tool for creatives. I know I don’t need a Mac Pro, as I certainly don’t need to spend Mac Pro money to type my words into Pages and frown at Microsoft Teams when it does something annoying. It’s a good thing then that there are other Mac devices for me, like the Mac Mini.

Not for me?

Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 editing.
Apple

But there doesn’t seem to be that same happy middle ground if I want to buy a new iPad. The new iPad Pro was presented as the ultimate portable tool for creative folk to get things done, and only the best musicians, artists, and filmmakers should apply. I’m none of those things, but I do have a pair of eyes that thank me when I stare at the 120Hz ProMotion screen on my 2020 iPad Pro, and once again, the new iPad Air only has a 60Hz screen, making me reluctant to pay nearly $1,300 for the 13-inch version with a Magic Keyboard.

And because the iPad Pro and its ProMotion 120Hz screen also packs in the new M4 chip, the Tandem OLED screen, and is wrapped in the impossibly thin aluminum case, even if I only want a modestly specced version with a Magic Keyboard, it will cost $2,048. That’s a massive premium to pay to get the extra display smoothness, and although I love the shadow removal feature for when you taking photos of documents that was demonstrated at the event, I don’t think I can make the math work to justify spending so much. And I would really try, believe me.

I’ve recently complained about the Google Pixel Tablet’s price cut to $400 not being enough to make it tempting due to it not including the best thing about it, but now we’re going in the entirely opposite direction. The iPad Pro is now so Pro that the price has become unfathomable, and unless you’re out ther directing multi-camera movies or intimately familiar with all the features in the Procreate app, it’s surely overkill of the highest order.

I don’t have a better choice

Official photo of the 2024 iPad Pro.
Apple

I asked the question of whether I was so mad that I would spend more than $2,000 on a new iPad Pro, knowing I wouldn’t use a huge percentage of its power and ability? I didn’t think I was, but the problem is, as my 2020 iPad Pro gets older, there isn’t another comparable alternative that I could happily buy instead. The aforementioned Pixel Tablet can’t keep up with the iPad (any of them), and the same goes for all Android tablets — even decent, versatile, low-cost ones like the Amazon Fire Max 11.

The iPad started life as a media-consumption device, and that’s still a big chunk of what I do with my iPad Pro today, right down to it replacing my Kindle Paperwhite after its battery died. But I know I’d miss the ProMotion screen if I changed to an iPad Air, and going down in spec when “upgrading” to a new model seems like a silly idea. If I were as fantastically creative and talented as the people using the iPad Pro during the Apple event, perhaps it would be easier to spend so much on it, but I’m simply not.

Today, I’ve learned that I’m not Pro enough for an iPad Pro, my eyes are too spoiled for the 60Hz iPad Air, and that — to truly upgrade my existing iPad to a 13-inch model — I’ll have to spend twice the amount I did on one four years ago. I’m not mad enough to do that, and because there doesn’t seem to be an iPad for me anymore, I’ll stick with what I’ve got until either it stops working or I become a multitalented artist overnight, one who is keen to use one, single, expensive device to create my masterpieces. It seems like that person is well-catered for.

Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
Don’t get too excited by those iOS 19 mock-ups — they’re probably not accurate
iOS 19 sample logo.

Everyone is getting hyped about the big design changes reportedly coming to iOS 19 this year -- so when Jon Prosser shared a mock-up based on an iMessage screen he claimed to have seen for himself, we all got excited.

A few hours later, however, the biggest Apple tipster of them all, Mark Gurman, shared a post on X addressing the images.

Read more
Forget the base iPad, the iPad Mini is my go-to tablet recommendation right now
Prakhar holding the iPad Mini 7.

I bought the 11-inch iPad Air 4 soon after its launch in 2020. But the excitement wore off after a few days. I kept it in the drawer and only used it for testing new iPadOS developer builds for the next three years. I couldn’t find a use case for a tablet in general—that is until I shifted to the 7th-generation iPad Mini.

Six months after launch, the new iPad Mini remains my travel companion for browsing and on-the-go entertainment. It’s the best iPad for me.
A complete iPad experience without any accessories

Read more
Apple might serve a massive front camera upgrade on iPhone 17
An iPhone 16 laying on a shelf with its screen on.

The domain of Apple leaks is currently obsessed with the controversial iPhone 17 Pro design refresh, which could stir some heated debate with its massive camera hump. A lot of chatter is also focused on the svelte iPhone 17 Air. Yet, it seems there are a few other internal upgrades worth getting excited about.
According to analyst Jeff Pu, Apple will equip all four iPhone 17 series models with an upgraded 24-megapixel front camera. So far, Apple has stuck with a 12-megapixel selfie snapper on its mainline iPhones. Moreover, the company hasn’t ever deployed a 24-megapixel camera sensor, keeping its experiments limited to 12-megapixel and 48-megapixel units in the past few years.
The research note by Pu, which was seen by MacRumors and 9to5Mac, doesn’t go into details about the specifications or feature details of the new 24-megapixel front snapper on the iPhone 17 series. However, we can take an educated guess, based on what Apple accomplished when it switched from 12-megapixel to 48-megapixel rear cameras.

A 24-megapixel sensor will most likely default to pixel-binning for delivering pictures and videos at a lower resolution than the native pixel count. Pixel-binning essentially combines the light data collected by adjacent pixels, creating what is colloquially known as a super-pixel.
The sum total of these efforts are pictures that are more detailed and with more realistic color rendering, especially in low-light scenarios. Depending on how the pixels are combined, the final image is usually a lower-resolution shot, but more pleasing to look at.
For example, the iPhone 16 Pro’s 48-megapixel main camera does 4-in-1 pixel binning to produce 12-megapixel pictures, but you can still stick full-res 48-megapixel shots, too. There’s also an intermediary option to to get the best of both worlds with 24-megapixel clicks.
With a 24-megapixel selfie camera coming into the picture, iPhone 17 buyers can expect improved selfies and better-quality video calls. Moreover, since there are more pixels to collect light data, Apple might leverage it to offer more advanced camera features, too.

Read more