Skip to main content

Is your child safe from inappropriate apps on Apple App Store? A report says no

App Store screenshot on iPhone.
Bryan M. Wolfe / Digital Trends

Apps aimed at children have been available since the inception of the App Store. However, not all apps created for minors are safe to use. This is the main finding of a new survey conducted by two child safety organizations. The report presents the results of a 24-hour research study in which 800 apps were reviewed, and the findings are concerning.

The Heat Initiative and ParentsTogether Action study found that Apple’s App Store is a mass distributor of risky and inappropriate apps to children. Many apps have features that put children at risk of sexual abuse and exploitation, low self-esteem and poor body image, disordered eating, exposure to sexual and violent content, and more. Apple claims that the App Store is a safe place for children, but the study found that Apple takes no legal responsibility for the veracity of age ratings.

Recommended Videos

Of the 800 apps reviewed, more than 200 risky apps were identified. These apps have a combined total of more than 550 million downloads. As part of the study, the researchers examined five categories of apps: chat, beauty, diet and weight loss, internet access, and gaming. They focused on apps with an age rating of 4+, 9+, or 12+. Apps rated 17+ were not included in the documentation.

The study revealed several startling findings. For example, it uncovered 25 chat apps that made it possible for strangers to communicate with minors. Other apps are designed to provide unfiltered internet access, even though filters at home or school are supposed to block banned sites.

Elsewhere, several beauty and body-related apps encouraged fasting and setting starvation-level calorie goals. Others, including “gaming” apps, focused on users providing naked photos and ones focused on violence.

Apple describes the App Store as a “trusted place” where users can safely discover and download apps. Apple conducts automated and manual checks on every app available in the App Store to ensure this safety. Additionally, the company has introduced safety features like Screen Time to protect underage users. However, with nearly 2 million apps hosted on the platform for devices like the iPad Air and iPhone 16, it would be impossible for Apple to identify every problematic app. As Apple states, “App Store security measures alone can never be perfect.”

App Store screenshot on iPhone.
Bryan M. Wolfe / Digital Trends

Ona personal note, my daughter recently turned 18, and I have allowed her to use apps since she was around 2. Over those 16 years, we discovered many apps that were marketed toward minors, but were highly inappropriate. As she grew older and her curiosity increased, I found it more challenging to shield her from the more explicit content on the App Store. However, I’d like to think that thanks to the tools Apple has provided over the years and my parenting efforts, she was protected from most, but no doubt not all, of the negative influences.

The survey makers suggest several ways to improve the App Store situation, including adding third-party reviews, increasing App Store rating process transparency, enforcing age ratings with accountability, and implementing more effective parental controls. These all sound like valuable solutions to consider, although some bad apples will no doubt remain even then.

The most effective way to protect minors from harmful content is for Apple to improve its process of identifying inappropriate apps before they receive approval. Apple should also collaborate with external organizations such as Heat Initiative and ParentsTogether Action to more rapidly identify and address any dangerous apps that may have slipped through the approval process. Even then, the best defense is engaged and informed parenting.

Parents can easily block the installation of new apps on their children’s devices using existing tools. They can also monitor the apps that have already been installed to ensure they are appropriate. This involves briefly using the apps themselves to verify that they are safe.

Bryan M. Wolfe
Bryan M. Wolfe has over a decade of experience as a technology writer. He writes about mobile.
iPhone 17 might finally fix Apple’s stingy ways with display upgrades
The Apple iPhone 16 Plus's home screen.

Social media is currently flooded with all kinds of rumors and concept renders purportedly depicting the upcoming iPhone 17 series. A few reliable insiders have also backed the claims of a fresh design. However, there’s another upgrade situation that will matter to users on a day-to-day basis.
According to Bloomberg, the baseline iPhone 17 model could finally get a high refresh rate aka ProMotion display. “The device is likely to get some small enhancements to its rear camera, as well as a ProMotion display, which allows for smoother scrolling and animation,” says the report.
If you’ve been following the competing Android ecosystem, high refresh rate screens are no longer a talking point. Even budget phones that cost as little as $200 will serve you a 90Hz or 120Hz panel. In the Apple ecosystem, you will have to spend at least a thousand dollars to experience that perk on an iPhone, or an iPad.

The “it didn’t matter” argument

Read more
Forget the iPhone 17, new leak says wait for the iPhone 18
iOS 18 logo on the iPhone 16 Pro

The iPhone 17 isn't even out yet and already we're getting word about the following model and signs suggest the iPhone 18 is worth waiting for.

Apple has been reported as working on the manufacturing process for its A20 chip. This, according to GF Securities' Apple analyst Jeff Pu, is a chip that is going to be built on the mind-melting 2nm scale known as N2.

Read more
Network tests show Apple C1 modem in iPhone 16e wins where it matters
The camera on the Apple iPhone 16e in White

When Apple introduced the iPhone 16e a few weeks ago, one aspect that drew the most attention was its network chip. The C1 is Apple’s first in-house modem to appear inside an iPhone, ditching the company’s total reliance on Qualcomm. However, there were also concerns about whether this modem is competitive.
The folks over at the popular internet speed testing platform, Ookla, tested the Apple-designed modem and found that it beats Qualcomm’s solution inside the iPhone 16 at a few crucial parameters. The analysis, which lasted roughly two weeks, covered AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile cellular networks.
On a general note, the iPhone 16e performed better than the iPhone 16 when tethered to AT&T and Verizon networks, while the reverse was true for T-Mobile. Ookla says the opposite T-Mobile results can be attributed to the carrier’s nationwide 5G standalone network (SA), while Apple’s C1 modem comes with limited SA compatibility.

When the going gets tough, C1 rises

Read more