Skip to main content

Children of the Corn is back. We talked with the director about the remake and Stephen King’s appeal

If remakes are what’s hot right now in Hollywood, then remakes of Stephen King adaptations are infernos. Everyone seems to be digging into the back catalog of the famous horror writer, with new versions of It, Pet Sematary, Carrie, and Firestarter all hitting big and small screens in the last decade. [Remakes of Salem’s Lot and Cujo are on the way.]

Another addition to that ever-growing list is a new version of Children of the Corn, which doesn’t deviate too much from the 1984 original with Peter Horton and Linda Hamilton. There’s lots of corn, some creepy kids, a few grisly deaths, and a charismatic leader who shouldn’t be trusted. Digital Trends talked with the 2023 remake’s director, Kurt Wimmer, about the enduring appeal of Stephen King and why he’s drawn to remaking classic genre films from the ’80s and ’90s.

Recommended Videos

Digital Trends: In researching your past work, I discovered you’ve been involved with a lot of remakes. You’ve written screenplays for the remakes of The Thomas Crown Affair, Total Recall, and Point Break. And now we have Children of the Corn, which is another remake. What’s so appealing to you about reinterpreting something that already exists?

Kids walk in a cornfield in Children of the Corn.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Kurt Wimmer: Absolutely nothing. [Laughs] I didn’t intend to be the “King of Remakes.” I’ve made a lot of movies and some of them are remakes. It’s just that this is the world that we live in now. It’s very difficult to get an original movie made. There has to be some sort of recognizable IP attached to it, like a comic book, a novel, or a previous movie that can be remade.

So there’s absolutely nothing that attracts me to them. With Point Break and Total Recall,I really loved those original movies so when I got the offer to write the remakes, I said to myself, “Well, listen, if somebody’s going to fuck it up, it might as well be me.” You don’t always have complete control over the movies you get to make.

I appreciate the honesty.

Sure. The Thomas Crown Affair was at the very beginning of my career. With that one, I couldn’t say no to doing it.

You said that you were a fan of the original Total Recall and Point Break. Is the same true with the 1984 version of Children of the Corn? And have you seen any of the nearly dozen sequels that have been made over the years?

I haven’t seen any of the sequels, to be honest. I just went back to the original material [the short story by Stephen King]. There’s a reason why so many sequels were made because the original material that King created has such resonance.

As written, Children of the Corn has a very bare-bones skeletal story with enormous elasticity, which allows it to be retold for different generations. The major theme of the story is generational warfare. In the 1984 version, it focused on religious fanaticism. Young people today who are 16 years old, if they go back and watch that movie, they won’t get it at all because that’s not what’s important today.

A girl looks shocked in Children of the Corn.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In 2023, I think children have a real bone to pick with adults in terms of the way the world is being administered around them. And we all know that the Earth is going to hell in a handbasket. And it’s certainly not the younger generation’s fault, but they’re the ones that are going to have to deal with and live with it. They’re not making the decisions. The adults are making these really lousy decisions. And so I can understand why kids would want to take matters into their own hands.

I think that is really something that deserves to be retold through a Children of the Corn remake. It’s a template that can be repeated over and over again. I think that 15 years from now, there’ll be a different reason for friction between adults and kids, and it should be remade again to address that friction.

Are you a big Stephen King fan?

CHILDREN OF THE CORN (2023) Official Red Band Trailer

Oh, yeah. When I was younger, I read a lot of his stuff. I love the classics like Carrie and The Shining, I really enjoyed those books. In recent years, I haven’t kept up with him. I mean, who can? He writes faster than you can read them.

What was the most challenging aspect of shooting this movie?

The hardest part was shooting in cornfields with a bunch of kids covered in blood. I mean, every movie is challenging, so I can’t say this one was more challenging than the rest. We shot in April 2020 during the early stages of COVID so at one point, we were the only movie actively in production on Earth. But I can’t say it was more challenging than any other movie I’ve done.

Children of the Corn is now playing in theaters.

Topics
Jason Struss
Section Editor, Entertainment
Jason Struss joined Digital Trends in 2022 and has never lived to regret it. He is the current Section Editor of the…
Children of the Corn trailer is a reimagining of the Stephen King horror story
A group of kids stand on a road with weapons in Children of the Corn.

In 1984, Children of the Corn terrified audiences with blood, murder, and cornfields as children murdered the adults from their town. Thirty-nine years later, the first trailer for the reimagined Children of the Corn promises to feature that same rage and level of violence as the original.

Based on the short story by Stephen King, the new Children of the Corn follows a 12-year-old girl named Eden Edwards (Station Eleven) who becomes possessed by an evil spirit in a cornfield, causing her to revolt against the adults. Eden recruits the children of her small Nebraska town in her quest to murder all of the adults. One high school student, Boleyn Williams (Jupiter's Legacy), opposes Eden's plan and attempts to save the remaining adults in the town from the corn monster, "He Who Walks Behind The Rows."

Read more
The Boogeyman might prove Stephen King movies are better if they’re based on his short stories
A young girl holding a lamp and looking scared in the movie "The Boogeyman."

The Boogeyman is the latest movie based on the oeuvre of Stephen King. Arguably the most important writer of the 20th century, King is a source of never-ending material for Hollywood, and the notoriously gluttonous town keeps churning movies out of every piece of writing King has ever done. But with most of his major novels and novellas already adapted and remade, Hollywood is turning to his short stories for inspiration.

For The Boogeyman, director Rob Savage uses King's 1973 short story as inspiration. The source material is brief but effective, presenting a well-told and chilling tale of parental doubt and fear disguised as a classic monster story. The adaptation seems to have changed several key aspects -- including the protagonist, the setting, and the core themes. However, it's understandable, especially because the source material is less than 10 pages long and revolves only around two characters. So, changing things to better fit the film medium is likely for the best. And King, master of horror as he may be, is also guilty of going overboard with his premises, especially if given the space to do so, potentially making his short stories better source material for the big-screen treatment than his books.

Read more
All Jacked Up and Full of Worms director talks psychosis and morality
Two men sit down and hold up worms in a scene from All Jacked Up and Full of Worms.

Admittedly, I have no idea how to describe what I witnessed in All Jacked Up and Full of Worms. The film depicts the adventures of Roscoe, a janitor at a motel "whose girlfriend has brought another man home for strange rituals," and Benny, a peculiar man "trying to manifest a baby from an inanimate sex doll." When the duo ingests hallucinogenic worms, all hell breaks loose as Roscoe and Benny spiral out of control on their drug-infused bender.

After speaking with writer/director Alex Phillips, I gained a better understanding as to why he constructed a transgressive horror that will divide audiences. As he says below, "If you're making a no-budget film and you are beholden to no one, why not be more adventurous with it? Take a bigger swing and a bigger risk." In a landscape where intellectual property and franchises dominate, filmmakers like Phillips are taking a different route, telling original and polarizing stories on their terms. As much as I struggled to understand the plot, I commend Phillips for crafting a story that caused me to think and react well after the film ended.

Read more