Skip to main content

YouTube tells creators to start labeling ‘realistic’ AI content

YouTube is taking steps to try to help viewers better understand if what they’re watching has been created, whether completely or in part, by generative AI.

“Generative AI is transforming the ways creators express themselves — from storyboarding ideas to experimenting with tools that enhance the creative process,” YouTube said in a message shared on Monday. “But viewers increasingly want more transparency about whether the content they’re seeing is altered or synthetic.”

Recommended Videos

Part of the effort to bolster trust in the popular streaming platform includes the launch of a new tool that requires creators to inform viewers when realistic-looking content (defined by YouTube as “content a viewer could easily mistake for a real person, place, or event”) is made with altered or synthetic media, including generative AI.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

YouTube offered up examples of content that creators should mark as having been altered:

  • Using the likeness of a realistic person: Digitally altering content to replace the face of one individual with another’s or synthetically generating a person’s voice to narrate a video
  • Altering footage of real events or places: Such as making it appear as if a real building caught fire or altering a real cityscape to make it appear different than in reality
  • Generating realistic scenes: Showing a realistic depiction of fictional major events, like a tornado moving toward a real town.

If a creator marks the content in this way, the disclosure will appear as a label. YouTube said that for most videos, the label will appear in the video’s expanded description, but for content involving more sensitive topics—such as health, news, elections, or finance—it will appear on the video itself to increase its prominence.

YouTube added that it’s not requiring creators to disclose content “that is clearly unrealistic, animated, includes special effects, or has used generative AI for production assistance.”

Additionally, the Google-owned company that creators aren’t required to highlight every instance where generative AI has been used in the broader production process. For example, there’s no need to disclose when the technology has been used to create scripts, content ideas, or automatic captions.

The new labels will roll out across all YouTube platforms in the coming weeks.

And a warning to YouTube creators who try to skip the requirement to highlight altered content voluntarily — YouTube said that in the future, it will “look at enforcement measures for creators who consistently choose not to disclose this information.” It added that it may even slap a label on content in cases where a creator has failed to do so, “especially if the altered or synthetic content has the potential to confuse or mislead people.”

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
YouTube hides dislike button count, drawing criticism from users and creators
Youtube video on mobile. Credits: YouTube official.

YouTube is currently the second-most-used platform in the world, and it has introduced a number of beneficial updates recently, such as offering translation options in the comments section of a YouTube video and introducing a "Media Literacy" campaign that empowers users to prevent misinformation. However, a recent update that hides the dislike button count has not gone down well with the creative community.

An announcement on the official YouTube blog has revealed the company would be making dislike counts private across its platform. While the creators will be able to see dislike counts, users will not. YouTube's justification for this is that it's seeking to reduce harassment of content creators, irrespective of their reach. YouTube revealed that it conducted an experiment earlier this year where the dislike button was available to viewers, but the dislike count was hidden. Because the count was hidden, it found that viewers or commenters were less likely to leave a dislike and engage in targeted harassment, which tends to occur at a higher proportion on smaller channels.

Read more
YouTube TV now works in Safari on Mac
YouTube TV on Safari web browser on Mac.

One of the biggest live TV streaming services in the United States finally works on one of the three major browsers in the world. YouTube TV -- before today had been unavailable in Safari on MacOS — now works on Apple's default browser. (As spotted by 9to5 Google.)

Previously, going to tv.youtube.com would kick you to a support page on all the other ways to watch YouTube TV if you were trying to do so from Safari. There's no word on what changed in Safari (or MacOS) to allow YouTube TV to finally be supported, but we're also not going to look gift horse in the mouth.

Read more
The Roku-YouTube-YouTube TV impasse isn’t over yet
YouTube TV on Roku.

It's been several months since Roku and YouTube TV reached a cease-fire in their dispute over ... well, over a few things. But it now looks like the war is heating back up.

To recap, Roku in April 2021 first announced that negotiations that would extend YouTube TV's availability on the Roku platform had broken down. In doing so, it said that "Roku cannot accept Google’s unfair terms as we believe they could harm our users." Exactly what those disputed terms are has been a little ambiguous. Roku has said it has to do with search results. Google calls any allegations baseless.

Read more